2018
DOI: 10.1155/2018/7618079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomechanical Comparison of Three Different Intramedullary Nails for Fixation of Unstable Basicervical Intertrochanteric Fractures of the Proximal Femur: Experimental Studies

Abstract: Objectives This biomechanical study was conducted to compare fixation stability of the proximal fragments and their mechanical characteristics in proximal femur models of unstable basicervical IT fractures fixed by cephalomedullary nailing using 3 different types of the femoral head fixation. Methods A total of 36 composite femurs corresponding to osteoporotic human bone were used. These specimens were fixed with Gamma 3 (hip screw type; group 1) in 12, Gamma 3 U-blade (screw-blade hybrid type; group 2) in 12,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
42
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
42
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, they did not describe and compare the BMD, details of fracture patterns such the presence of a basicervical component and comminution of the anterior cortex, and quality of reduction, which can affect fixation failures such as cut-out. Further, they did not describe cut-through (the specific failure feature of PFNA), which is more likely to be caused by greater migration of the PFNA blade within the femoral head, as shown in a previous biomechanical study 33 . Finally, their cohort was relatively smaller than our cohort.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…However, they did not describe and compare the BMD, details of fracture patterns such the presence of a basicervical component and comminution of the anterior cortex, and quality of reduction, which can affect fixation failures such as cut-out. Further, they did not describe cut-through (the specific failure feature of PFNA), which is more likely to be caused by greater migration of the PFNA blade within the femoral head, as shown in a previous biomechanical study 33 . Finally, their cohort was relatively smaller than our cohort.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Compared with other fixation devices, PFNA‐II had the greatest failure load and structural stability. PFNA‐II was also more effective in minimizing the rotation instability of the proximal fragment in basicervical fractures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Of course, elderly patients cannot be excluded because of their low activity level, which results in a low amount of weight‐bearing on the femoral head and a low pressure on the femoral head; this results in a low incidence of femoral head necrosis, which requires follow‐up analysis of large samples in the future. In addition, after the spiral blade is inserted into the femoral head and neck, the blade cannot rotate and the bone anchor closes tightly with the greatest degree of bone filling pressure and anchorage force, which is not easy to loosen, with the greatest degree of bone filling pressure and anchor force; thus, this procedure is more suitable for patients with fractures due to osteoporosis or instability and is advantageous for patients who participate in early weight‐bearing. This procedure can improve that curative effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%