2002
DOI: 10.1053/jars.2002.30609
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomechanical comparison of hamstring and patellar tendon graft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

11
162
2
6

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 223 publications
(184 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
11
162
2
6
Order By: Relevance
“…A major cause for concern with the use of hamstring autografts is, the soft tissue can take up to 12 weeks to heal to the osseous tunnel. 3,4 Thus, a secure fixation technique is needed to withstand the forces on the graft resulting from current rehabilitation protocols that allow for unrestricted ROM, weight bearing, and early return to athletic activity after ACL reconstruction. 3,5 The purpose of our study was twofold: (1) to investigate whether there is any difference in functional outcomes with these fixation methods as measured by the Lysholm knee score and (2) to determine whether there is a difference in the tunnel widening with joint line fixation using interference screws (aperture fixation) versus EndoButton (suspensary fixation) of hamstring autografts in ACL reconstruction and does it affect the functional outcome.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A major cause for concern with the use of hamstring autografts is, the soft tissue can take up to 12 weeks to heal to the osseous tunnel. 3,4 Thus, a secure fixation technique is needed to withstand the forces on the graft resulting from current rehabilitation protocols that allow for unrestricted ROM, weight bearing, and early return to athletic activity after ACL reconstruction. 3,5 The purpose of our study was twofold: (1) to investigate whether there is any difference in functional outcomes with these fixation methods as measured by the Lysholm knee score and (2) to determine whether there is a difference in the tunnel widening with joint line fixation using interference screws (aperture fixation) versus EndoButton (suspensary fixation) of hamstring autografts in ACL reconstruction and does it affect the functional outcome.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, distal suspensory fixation could induce the "bungee cord effect" or "windshield-wiper effect" and lead to tunnel enlargement during the transition from flexion to extension. (Hoher, et al, 1998, Schultz, et al, 2007 Previous studies indicated that increased length between ACL fixation points may decrease stiffness and increase displacement during cyclic loading (Scheffler, et al, 2002) which results in decreasing the knee (Ishibashi, et al, 1997). Therefore, the lower laxity of knees repaired using SSSAS compared to the Pull-Out technique in the present study may be the result of decreased length between the fixation point and the tibial insertion site.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Nepaisant didelio skaièiaus klinikiniø tyrimø, kuriø metu buvo tiriamos priekinio kryþminio raiðèio traumos ir rekonstrukcijos, vis dar neaiðkios prieþastys, lemianèios sugráþimà á buvusá aktyvumo lygá. Beje, kitø tyrimø autoriai nenurodo tikslaus pacientø sugráþimo á buvusá fizinio aktyvumo lygá laiko, bet tik pageidautinà sugráþimo laikà (1,4,7,9,10,(12)(13)(14)(15)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30). Visi tyrimai, deja, buvo sukoncentruoti tik á sugráþimo faktà, bet ne sugráþimo laikà (1,4,7,9,10,(12)(13)(14)(15)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30).…”
Section: Lentelë Galutinis Ikdc áVertinimasunclassified