2011
DOI: 10.1097/bot.0b013e3181ee3db7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomechanical Comparison of Fixation Techniques in Midshaft Clavicular Fractures

Abstract: The locking plate is significantly more stable than DCP and Ex-fix under torsional and bending cyclic loading in a displaced fracture clavicle model.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
42
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
42
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This early failure may be due to using non-locking screws and formalin-fixed bones and is thus difficult to compare with our study [15]. In our study, a load of 80 N and the 1,000 cycles of cantilever bending did not challenge the implants up to their maximum load bearing capacity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…This early failure may be due to using non-locking screws and formalin-fixed bones and is thus difficult to compare with our study [15]. In our study, a load of 80 N and the 1,000 cycles of cantilever bending did not challenge the implants up to their maximum load bearing capacity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…The radiological and clinical indications to perform osteosynthesis of mid-shaft clavicle fractures are still debated, and the suggested technique, choice of plate and position also vary in the literature [5,7,8,[10][11][12][13][14]. Despite the widespread use of locking plate osteosynthesis in clavicle fracture treatment, there is little clinical information about outcome and potential benefits of its use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The locking plate theoretically offers increased stability of fixation, which again should allow for application of greater forces than conventional reconstruction or dynamic compression plates (DCP) plates. Biomechanical studies investigating the impact of torsional and bending load forces on both locking and DCP supports the concept that improved fixation is achieved when using a locking plate [7,8]. Clinical studies support advantages of locking plates over more conventional plate types [8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…[16,17,22,23] Demirhan ve ark. [18] kadavra klavikulalarında yaptıkları deneysel çalışmada, kırık stabilizasyonunda plak vida yönteminin diğer osteosentez materyallerine göre daha stabil olduğunu göstermişlerdir. Kilitli klavikula plakları ile klasik dinamik kompresyon plaklarını karşılaştıran klinik çalışmalarda da kilitli anatomik plakların daha başarılı olduğu gösterilmiştir.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…[12][13][14][15] Yapılan çalışmalar kırık redüksiyonu ve stabilite sağlamakta DCP (Dinamik kompresyon plakları) ve LC-DCP (kilitli ve dinamik kompresyonlu plak) arasında fark olmadığını göstermekle beraber LC-DCP plaklarının az temas yüzeyleri sayesinde periost dolaşımını bozmadığı ve kı-rık iyileşmesine pozitif etki ettiği gösterilmiştir. [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] Çalışmamızda kilitli anatomik klavikula plakları ile tedavi edilen klavikula kırıklarının radyolojik ve klinik sonuçlarını araştırdık. tedavi edilen 31 hastanın 32 klavikula cisim kırığı çalışmaya alındı.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified