2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.11.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomechanical behavior of endocrown restorations with different cavity design and CAD-CAM materials under a static and vertical load: A finite element analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Maximum principal stress levels were higher in VS with a higher elastic modulus than in resin matrix ceramics (23,24). We observed that resin-matrix ceramics (CS and SB) with more elastic modulus properties had a lower risk of fracture compared to VS material.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Maximum principal stress levels were higher in VS with a higher elastic modulus than in resin matrix ceramics (23,24). We observed that resin-matrix ceramics (CS and SB) with more elastic modulus properties had a lower risk of fracture compared to VS material.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Using the contact deformation mechanism of the tooth-restoration system approximates the nature of the deformation to real life cases. To date, studies on numerical analysis of the deformation of the tooth with restorations of the biomechanical system have shown that contact bonding has little effect, which does not allow for a reliable assessment of the deformation features of the biomechanical unit [ 19 , 23 ]. In the present paper, it was established that Herculite XRV is the most suitable material for deep wedging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finite element analysis (FEM) tools are well suited for this purpose. FEM has become firmly established in the medical practice of solving dental problems [ 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 ]. FEM also makes it possible to evaluate the effectiveness of different treatment tactics and material choices at the treatment planning stage [ 24 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparable survival and success rates for endocrowns and conventional post‐retained crown restorations were shown (Al‐Dabbagh, 2021 ), indicating that endocrowns are a reliable treatment option for compromised root filled molars and premolars. Recommendations for the preparation design include a depth of 3 mm for the central retention cavity with a divergence angle of 6–12° for more homogenous stress distribution (Abtahi et al, 2022 ; Tribst et al, 2021 ). The cervical margin width should be at least 2 mm, and prepared flat or slightly bevelled (Zheng et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Endocrownsmentioning
confidence: 99%