2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2020.105068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomechanical analysis on total knee replacement patients during gait: Medial pivot or posterior stabilized design?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
12
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
3
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In terms of the postoperative QS recovery, both groups experienced a signi cant drop in NQS and OL-QS at 2 weeks, but then recovered 6 weeks after TKR. These ndings were different than the previous studies that demonstrated the signi cant postoperative QS de cit as 59%-62% at the rst month and the recovery to the preoperative level at 6 months after TKR [7,15,21]. This difference could be explained by the following areas with differences in methodology between the previous studies and the present study: the QS assessment method (electromechanical dynamometer vs. handheld dynamometer), the knee position during the measurement (60 o -75 o knee exion vs. 30 o knee exion), the inhibitory effect of preoperative pain and postoperative pain recovery on QS measurement, and the possible effect of blood loss reduction on functional recovery by tranexamic acid injection [9].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In terms of the postoperative QS recovery, both groups experienced a signi cant drop in NQS and OL-QS at 2 weeks, but then recovered 6 weeks after TKR. These ndings were different than the previous studies that demonstrated the signi cant postoperative QS de cit as 59%-62% at the rst month and the recovery to the preoperative level at 6 months after TKR [7,15,21]. This difference could be explained by the following areas with differences in methodology between the previous studies and the present study: the QS assessment method (electromechanical dynamometer vs. handheld dynamometer), the knee position during the measurement (60 o -75 o knee exion vs. 30 o knee exion), the inhibitory effect of preoperative pain and postoperative pain recovery on QS measurement, and the possible effect of blood loss reduction on functional recovery by tranexamic acid injection [9].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Second, although this study was a double-blinded RCT, our sample size was relatively small and might not detect some postoperative complications related to the CLS technique, such as suture breakage or wound infection. Third, our study did not explore the other factors that might affect the QS recovery, such as surgeon experience [13], prosthesis design [7], and the use of barbed suture [25]. Therefore, future prospective and multicenter RCTs with a large sample size are required to assess the effect of CLS in the general population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, a small range of motion during gait activity and low walking speed may weaken the benefit of the particular design of the MP implant. The medial pivoting motion is expected to be more prevalent in more active patients during activities of a more extensive range of motion, as reported by other investigators ( Miyazaki et al, 2011 ; Esposito et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…To the author’s best knowledge, there is no data available regarding in vivo knee kinematics in Chinese MP TKA patients during daily activities, such as walking. Some studies have investigated knee kinematics during gait activity in Caucasian patients ( Papagiannis et al, 2016 ; Benjamin et al, 2018 ; Esposito et al, 2020 ; Miura et al, 2020 ), reporting better mimicking of normal knee kinematics of MP TKA than other designs. Nevertheless, Chinese patients are manifested with more severity of osteoarthritis and walking disabilities than Caucasian patients before surgery ( Zhang et al, 2001 ; Kang et al, 2009 ; Lin et al, 2010 ; Liu et al, 2017 ), which may restrict their function restoration after TKA surgery, such as adopting a slow walking speed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the hypothesized kinematic improvements of MP designs have been realized in gait analysis, but postoperative kinematics for MP (and CR and PS) bearings still do not match a native, nonarthritic joint 3 nor is benefit always seen. 25 Along with the hypothetical benefits, there are hypothetical disadvantages too. The increased conformity may lead to component impingement, which may limit femoral roll back and flexion in some patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%