2013
DOI: 10.1097/brs.0b013e31827a641e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomechanical Analysis of Vertebral Derotation Techniques for the Surgical Correction of Thoracic Scoliosis

Abstract: Biomechanically, it is possible to significantly improve the correction of thoracic scoliotic deformities, particularly in the transverse plane, when using vertebral derotation maneuvers.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Only a few published papers proposed methods for the estimation of the instrumentation loads during and after deformity correction. In the studies conducted with the S3 simulator, topics, such as the optimum screw patterns to minimize the forces required to achieve the desired corrections in adolescent scoliotic subjects (Wang et al, 2012b ), the efficacy of some correction maneuvers (Wang et al, 2011 ; Martino et al, 2013 ) and of different instrumentations (Wang et al, 2012a ) were investigated. Abe and coworkers (Abe et al, 2015 ) predicted the corrective forces in 20 adolescent patients based on the changes in rod geometry and finite element analysis, based on post-operative CT scans.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only a few published papers proposed methods for the estimation of the instrumentation loads during and after deformity correction. In the studies conducted with the S3 simulator, topics, such as the optimum screw patterns to minimize the forces required to achieve the desired corrections in adolescent scoliotic subjects (Wang et al, 2012b ), the efficacy of some correction maneuvers (Wang et al, 2011 ; Martino et al, 2013 ) and of different instrumentations (Wang et al, 2012a ) were investigated. Abe and coworkers (Abe et al, 2015 ) predicted the corrective forces in 20 adolescent patients based on the changes in rod geometry and finite element analysis, based on post-operative CT scans.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[22][23][24] Improved understanding of the forces acting on the deformity 2,25 has led to refinements of correction strategies, fixation devices, and implant materials. 4,7,[26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33] More recently, the possibilities of shortening the required arthrodesis [33][34][35] using less soft tissue dissection, 16,36 and using fewer implants 18,37-40 have been investigated in an effort to decrease fusion-related morbidity, 13,14 retain maximum spinal motion, and decrease costs. 17 The concept of dynamic segmental fixation to guide spinal growth without fusion has also been explored.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mono-axial pedicle screws, compared with multi-axial screws, are known to allow better correction of scoliosis and significantly improved rib cage symmetry when using the DVBD technique. 20,21 This better correction of rotational deformity in the transverse plane can be attributed to no degree of freedom between the head and the body of the pedicle screw. 21 A third type of pedicle screw was introduced, the head of which pivots in only one plane (sagittal), and theoretically, it provides more effortless rod loading whilst maintaining the ability of mono-axial screws to de-rotate the spine.…”
Section: Biomechanics Of Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20,21 This better correction of rotational deformity in the transverse plane can be attributed to no degree of freedom between the head and the body of the pedicle screw. 21 A third type of pedicle screw was introduced, the head of which pivots in only one plane (sagittal), and theoretically, it provides more effortless rod loading whilst maintaining the ability of mono-axial screws to de-rotate the spine. 22 In 2011, Wang et al reported the MDOF system in which screws are connected to rods with post-connectors providing 6°-of-freedom (translation in two planes and rotation in four planes) relative motion while mono-axial screws provide 2°-of-freedom (only translation and rotation).…”
Section: Biomechanics Of Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%