2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2004.03.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomechanical analysis of Oligochaeta crawling

Abstract: Hydrostatic skeletons, such as that of Oligochaeta and Hirudinea, allow the locomotion of animals with soft segmented bodies. In this paper crawling of Oligochaeta, and in particular that of earthworm (Lumbricus terrestris), is analyzed from a biomechanical point of view, starting from the experimental kinematic description of deformations coupled with a simple friction model. The analysis is able to predict crawling velocity with an error of about 15% with respect to the experimental measured values. Also mus… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(7 reference statements)
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It assumes elliptical cross-sections and constant volume, and simulates the vermiform elongation and pressure changes of a leech. The motions of leeches have also been described using Lagrangian mechanics and a large system of differential-algebraic equations (Alscher and Beyn, 1998) and by modeling a mass transfer wave that describes peristalsis (Accoto et al, 2004;Dobrolyubov and Douchy, 2002).…”
Section: Hydrostatic Skeleton Models In Biologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It assumes elliptical cross-sections and constant volume, and simulates the vermiform elongation and pressure changes of a leech. The motions of leeches have also been described using Lagrangian mechanics and a large system of differential-algebraic equations (Alscher and Beyn, 1998) and by modeling a mass transfer wave that describes peristalsis (Accoto et al, 2004;Dobrolyubov and Douchy, 2002).…”
Section: Hydrostatic Skeleton Models In Biologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 such velocity is plotted for the robot and the earthworm, showing that the same velocity Fig. 9 A comparison between velocity [body lengths/s] scaling for the robot and for the biological model (data after Accoto et al, 2004) [lengths/s] is reached when the mass is m = 1.3 g. Such mass is very close to that of the current crawler prototype (i.e. 1.2 g).…”
Section: Discussion and Comparison Between Robotic Crawler And Lumbrimentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Soft crawlers: from Nature to robotics From anellids, as earthworms [1,53] and leeches [58], to gastropods [40], Nature offers us a large collection of crawling strategies. Each species implements the fundamental mechanism of crawling locomotion in its own way: not only we can observe large differences in the periodic shape change exploited to move [39], but we also find several elements, like mucus or setae, used to modify the frictional interaction with the environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%