2017
DOI: 10.4081/or.2017.7067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomechanical analysis of four external fixation pin insertion techniques

Abstract: Having multiple external fixation pin designs and insertion techniques has led to debate as to which combination creates the stiffest construct. This study sought to biomechanically evaluate construct strength using self-drilling (SD) and self-tapping (ST) pins inserted with either bicortical or unicortical fixation. SD and ST 5.0 mm stainless steel pins were used in combination with bicortical self-drilling (BCSD), bicortical self-tapping (BCST), unicortical self-drilling (UCSD), and unicortical selftapping (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bi-cortical Schanz pins penetrate both the near and far bone cortices, which, passing through the medullary canal, cause damage to its vascular net (4). In bicortical xation, while drilling the far cortex, the threads of the self-drilling pins may destroy the bone thread that has already been prepared in the near cortex (13).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bi-cortical Schanz pins penetrate both the near and far bone cortices, which, passing through the medullary canal, cause damage to its vascular net (4). In bicortical xation, while drilling the far cortex, the threads of the self-drilling pins may destroy the bone thread that has already been prepared in the near cortex (13).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%