2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jflm.2018.11.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomechanical analysis of a femur fracture in osteoarchaeology: Reconstruction of pathomechanics, treatment and gait

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As to treatment, bioarchaeological literature infers the use of splinting and or immobilisation because of the angulation of fractures and the alignment of the stumps (e.g., Grauer & Roberts, 1996; Licata et al, 2019). However, inferences of treatment are particularly problematic as little evidence survives in the archaeological record.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As to treatment, bioarchaeological literature infers the use of splinting and or immobilisation because of the angulation of fractures and the alignment of the stumps (e.g., Grauer & Roberts, 1996; Licata et al, 2019). However, inferences of treatment are particularly problematic as little evidence survives in the archaeological record.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Angulation at Souskiou-Laona is dorsal and lateral and involves somewhat greater angles. Therefore, it is logical to posit at least some loss of function and visible deformity.As to treatment, bioarchaeological literature infers the use of splinting and or immobilisation because of the angulation of fractures and the alignment of the stumps (e.g.,Grauer & Roberts, 1996;Licata et al, 2019). However, inferences of treatment are particularly problematic as little evidence survives in the archaeological record.Although the MCI fractures from Souskiou-Laona display malunion indicating a lack of adequate reduction, the advanced stage of healing suggests that some care may have been taken to stabilise or immobilise the fractures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On top of illustrating the growth of interest in shape analyses in palaeopathology, our meta‐analysis also revealed key trends that summarize how shape analyses have so far been used in palaeopathology. Overall, we identified four such themes: Describe pathological conditions and support/refute diagnoses (e.g., Berezina & Buzhilova, 2021; Berner et al, 2021; Colombo et al, 2018; Darton et al, 2015; DeSilva & Papakyrikos, 2011; Gunz et al, 2004; Hershkovitz et al, 1997; Milella et al, 2015; Rmoutilová et al, 2020; Slon et al, 2013; Thompson, 2014; Trinkaus, 2018; Vairamuthu & Pfeiffer, 2018; Viciano et al, 2017; Zhao et al, 2020) Understand how specific traits and shape characteristics predispose individuals to pathological conditions (e.g., Bédécarrats et al, 2021; Calce et al, 2018; Mansukoski & Sparacello, 2018; Mays, 2006; Plomp et al, 2012; Plomp et al, 2019; Plomp et al, 2020; Plomp, Viðarsdóttir, Weston, et al, 2015; Shepstone, 2001; Shepstone et al, 1999; Ward et al, 2010; Weiss, 2005) Identify and interpret adaptations and alterations in functional anatomy in response to pathological conditions (e.g., Berner et al, 2021; Churchill & Formicola, 1997; Gilmour et al, 2019; Lazenby & Pfeiffer, 1993; Licata et al, 2019; Micarelli et al, 2018; Roberts et al, 2004; Sparacello et al, 2016; Thompson, 2014; Trinkaus, 2018; Viciano et al, 2017; Viva et al, 2021; Zhao et al, 2020) Provide insight into aspects of physical and social experience, care practices, therapeutic interventions, and social organization (e.g., Bédécarrats et al, 2021; Chevalier, 2019; Cowgill et al, 2015; Formicola & Buzhilova, 2004; Gilmour et al, …”
Section: Sculpting a Palaeopathology Of Shapementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some cases, these larger interpretations arise as a result of the research outcomes, especially when case studies are reported. Not surprisingly, in these instances, authors tended to position their interpretations relative to the individual, that is, reflecting on the individual's experience of a therapeutic intervention, prosthetic, mobility aid, or other adaptive mechanism (e.g., Chevalier, 2019; Lazenby & Pfeiffer, 1993; Licata et al, 2019; Viciano et al, 2017), or their ability to participate in or contribute to their community (e.g., Cowgill et al, 2015; Micarelli et al, 2018). In addition to studies that describe the impact on the individual, other cases used insight derived from these individuals to shed light on patterns in funerary practices (e.g., Formicola & Buzhilova, 2004), experiences of disease progression (e.g., Sparacello et al, 2016), and even social organization within communities (e.g., Vairamuthu & Pfeiffer, 2018).…”
Section: Sculpting a Palaeopathology Of Shapementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Osteoarchaeologists typically reconstruct ancient human behaviour and lifestyle from external morphology, morphometry and robusticity of limb bones (Licata et al, 2019; Meyer, Nicklisch, Held, Fritsch, & Alt, 2011; Ruff, 2008; Ruff & Larsen, 2014; Villotte & Knüsel, 2013; Wanner, Sosa, Alt, & Blos, 2007). However, when internal bone structures are well preserved, behavioural inferences can also be achieved through histological methods (e.g., Miszkiewicz & Mahoney, 2016; Robling & Stout, 2003; Stout, 1978).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%