2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2022.103850
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomechanical analysis of a customized lumbar interspinous spacer based on transfacetopedicular screw fixation: A finite element study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gazzeri reported, "The ISP analyses increase the risk of fracture of the spiny process". The prosthesis avoids Comparing the results with those of other researchers that have used the FEM to visualize the behavior of various ISP [32,[50][51][52][53][54], it is concluded that the results are satisfactory since, in these studies, the maximum forces are generated in the prosthesis and the deformations are reduced. Therefore, the prostheses end up providing excellent stability to the spine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Gazzeri reported, "The ISP analyses increase the risk of fracture of the spiny process". The prosthesis avoids Comparing the results with those of other researchers that have used the FEM to visualize the behavior of various ISP [32,[50][51][52][53][54], it is concluded that the results are satisfactory since, in these studies, the maximum forces are generated in the prosthesis and the deformations are reduced. Therefore, the prostheses end up providing excellent stability to the spine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The model's validation was performed considering the behavior of the FEM model in relaxed standing without the ISP versus the loads and ROMs used by other researchers. In the literature, the forces employed in experiments and simulations vary from 220 N to 1200 N [32,[50][51][52][53]. The displacements coincide with other research [54].…”
Section: Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 75%