2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-018-5623-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomechanical advantages of supplemental accessory and satellite rods with and without interbody cages implantation for the stabilization of pedicle subtraction osteotomy

Abstract: The study supports the current clinical practice providing a strong biomechanical rationale to recommend 4-rod constructs based on accessory rods combined with cages adjacent to PSO site. Although weaker, the usage of accessory rods without cages and of a central satellite rod with hooks in combination with interbody spacers may also be justified. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
40
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
7
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A limitation of the present work is the sample size: five specimens have a limited statistical power. It worth noticing that the results here reported are in agreement with the kinematics data reported for a larger specimens' cohort [44]. As this study is extremely demanding in terms of costs, testing and strain analysis, it was not possible to extend to a larger sample.…”
Section: Clockwise Vs Counterclockwise Axial Torsionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…A limitation of the present work is the sample size: five specimens have a limited statistical power. It worth noticing that the results here reported are in agreement with the kinematics data reported for a larger specimens' cohort [44]. As this study is extremely demanding in terms of costs, testing and strain analysis, it was not possible to extend to a larger sample.…”
Section: Clockwise Vs Counterclockwise Axial Torsionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…PSO procedure is often accompanied by a high risk of rod breakage and pseudarthrosis at the osteotomy level due to the extensive resection through posterior, middle and anterior bony and ligamentous structures, featuring unique biomechanical challenges [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] . Previous biomechanical studies demonstrated improved primary stability and reduced instrumentation loads using multi-rod constructs and additional interbody spacers [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] . However, they focused on the load supported by the posterior instrumentation in relation to rod breakage, neglecting the load supported by the anterior column, which is fundamental to promote fusion across the osteotomy early after surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the flexibility tests, the primary rods at PSO level were posteriorly instrumented with rectangular strain gauge (SGs) rosettes (KFG-2-120-D17-11L1M2S; Kyowa Electronic Instruments Co. Ltd, Tokyo, Japan) on the most posterior part of the rods 11,12,35,36 . Compensation of thermal effects was achieved connecting each SG to a dummy compensator in a half-bridge configuration to a MX840B (HBM, Darmstadt, Germany) amplifier.…”
Section: Strain Gauge Analysis On Primary Rodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be a starting point for other studies in which the behavior of other ligaments could be investigated under different loading conditions or after surgical interventions on the spine [36].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%