Biomaterials for dental composite applications: A comprehensive review of physical, chemical, mechanical, thermal, tribological, and biological properties
Abstract:Biomaterials have been widely used in dental composite materials or implants and their physical, mechanical, wear, and biocompatibility characteristics must be evaluated for clinical application. Extensive research has been committed to establishing various scientific methods for customizing the microstructure of dental biomaterials.
“…Dental appliances must withstand forces during mastication; dental alloys must meet minimum mechanical properties requirements. Mechanical properties ( Yadav et al., 2022 ) of some of the significant Ti alloys employed in dental and surgical treatment are shown in Figure 2 ( Sarraf et al., 2022 ). Figure 2 Mechanical characteristics of numerous titanium alloys for dental implants ( Sarraf et al., 2022 ).…”
“…Dental appliances must withstand forces during mastication; dental alloys must meet minimum mechanical properties requirements. Mechanical properties ( Yadav et al., 2022 ) of some of the significant Ti alloys employed in dental and surgical treatment are shown in Figure 2 ( Sarraf et al., 2022 ). Figure 2 Mechanical characteristics of numerous titanium alloys for dental implants ( Sarraf et al., 2022 ).…”
“…In which 13 PDA's and five alternatives were investigated to determine the ranking of the dental composites 29 . Those studies indicate that the MCMD technique could be used as a potential tool for selecting best composition of dental restorative composites 30–38 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DM-6 0.13, 0.24, 0.40 0.13, 0.24, 0.39 0.07, 0.14, 0.25 0.00, 0.01, 0.04 0.03, 0.06, 0.12 0.00, 0.00, 0.02 0.00, 0.00, 0.01 0.00, 0.00, 0.01 used as a potential tool for selecting best composition of dental restorative composites. [30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38] 4 | CONCLUSION Two hybrid nZr-TiO 2 and nZr-MDP dental series have been fabricated…”
Section: Assessment Of the Ranking Of The Dental Composite Alternativesmentioning
The article aimed to develop and characterize the nano-micro ceramic particle-filled polymer-based composite as dental materials. The current study also deals with the ranking of dental composites using a hybrid fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP)fuzzy technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (FTOPSIS) methodology. Dental composites were fabricated from resin matrix and ceramic particulates. Two different series were fabricated. Zirconia, titanium oxide, and marble dust powder were used as ceramic particles in the dental composite. Bis-GMA, TEGDMA, CQ, and DMAEMA were employed for the resin matrix of dental composite. The physical and mechanical properties were investigated for both dental formulations. The maximum and minimum compressive strengths were recorded in DM-6 (321 MPa) and . Polymerization shrinkage was gradually decreased in both hybrid nZr-TiO 2 and hybrid nZr-MDP formulations. The FTOPSIS was used to determine the rank of alternatives as DT-6 > DM-6 > DM-4 > DT-4 > DM-2 > DM-0 > DT-0 > DT-2.
“…For bone-substituting implants, the standard requirements are mechanical resistance and load-bearing capacity, which are associated with the material’s bulk properties [ 7 , 8 , 9 ]. However, the bone-implant junction (osseointegration), the osteosynthesis performance (osteogenesis capability), the ability to prevent infections, and the corrosion resistance are surface-related properties [ 4 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 ].…”
Biomaterials with adequate properties to direct a biological response are essential for orthopedic and dental implants. The surface properties are responsible for the biological response; thus, coatings with biologically relevant properties such as osteoinduction are exciting options to tailor the surface of different bulk materials. Metal oxide coatings such as TiO2, ZrO2, Nb2O5 and Ta2O5 have been suggested as promising for orthopedic and dental implants. However, a comparative study among them is still missing to select the most promising for bone-growth-related applications. In this work, using magnetron sputtering, TiO2, ZrO2, Ta2O5, and Nb2O5 thin films were deposited on Si (100) substrates. The coatings were characterized by Optical Profilometry, Scanning Electron Microscopy, Energy-Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy, X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy, X-ray Diffraction, Water Contact Angle measurements, and Surface Free Energy calculations. The cell adhesion, viability, proliferation, and differentiation toward the osteoblastic phenotype of mesenchymal stem cells plated on the coatings were measured to define the biological response. Results confirmed that all coatings were biocompatible. However, a more significant number of cells and proliferative cells were observed on Nb2O5 and Ta2O5 compared to TiO2 and ZrO2. Nevertheless, Nb2O5 and Ta2O5 seemed to induce cell differentiation toward the osteoblastic phenotype in a longer cell culture time than TiO2 and ZrO2.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
