2014
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.33131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomaterial properties of cholecyst‐derived scaffold recovered by a non‐detergent/enzymatic method

Abstract: Isolation procedures for the recovery of extracellular matrices (ECMs) from animal organs/tissues that are useful in regenerative medicine involve multiple sequential steps/stages including collection of the source organ at slaughter, their transportation to laboratory, decellularization, decontamination, stabilization, and sterilization. Most of these steps require extensive use of chemicals/reagents/enzymes which may also adversely affect the quality of the scaffold. With an effort to minimize the use of che… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
43
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…20 The scaffolds were implanted in a rat subcutaneous model that is frequently used for evaluating local tissue response. 20 The scaffolds were implanted in a rat subcutaneous model that is frequently used for evaluating local tissue response.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…20 The scaffolds were implanted in a rat subcutaneous model that is frequently used for evaluating local tissue response. 20 The scaffolds were implanted in a rat subcutaneous model that is frequently used for evaluating local tissue response.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 The procedure involved ex vivo incubation of the source organ in a stabilising agent (10% neutral buffered formalin), that also caused in situ cross linking of biomolecules, followed by mechanical delamination of the ECM beneath the mucosa from other tissue layers. 20 The procedure involved ex vivo incubation of the source organ in a stabilising agent (10% neutral buffered formalin), that also caused in situ cross linking of biomolecules, followed by mechanical delamination of the ECM beneath the mucosa from other tissue layers.…”
Section: Scaffold Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Traditionally, for adequate tissue fixation, 10% NBF has been proposed for routine histology of biological tissues. Therefore, the concentration of NBF was kept as 10% in the original nonenzymatic and nondetergent method (Anilkumar et al, ) of preparing tissue engineering scaffolds from porcine cholecyst, jejunum, and bladder. This formed the rationale for the selection of 10% as the maximum concentration of the NBF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of fewer fibrils in CDS‐10 (Figure e) compared with other preparations also reflected the extent of the cross‐linking. Considering that the collagen is the most abundant protein present in the CDS (Anilkumar et al, ), the extent of cross‐linking in the variably cross‐linked scaffolds was assessed by enzymatic degradation of the CDS with collagenase. Progressive degradation of the material on decreasing the concentration of formaldehyde (Figure ) was an indication that cross‐linking had taken place in a controlled manner.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%