Innovative Perspectives in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-75750-2_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomaterial for Osseous Reconstruction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, therapeutic alternatives are urgently needed. Tissue engineering approaches are based on the production of substituting material with the capacity to mimic the biological environment of healthy tissue [ 127 ] and various bone-substitute biomaterials are now available [ 128 ], which represent a valuable tool for researchers to guide bone tissue regeneration. However, the definition of the most appropriate biomaterial for bone tissue engineering is still debated [ 126 ], and the development of clinically relevant bone constructs still remains the major challenge [ 3 ].…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, therapeutic alternatives are urgently needed. Tissue engineering approaches are based on the production of substituting material with the capacity to mimic the biological environment of healthy tissue [ 127 ] and various bone-substitute biomaterials are now available [ 128 ], which represent a valuable tool for researchers to guide bone tissue regeneration. However, the definition of the most appropriate biomaterial for bone tissue engineering is still debated [ 126 ], and the development of clinically relevant bone constructs still remains the major challenge [ 3 ].…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the definition of the most appropriate biomaterial for bone tissue engineering is still debated [ 126 ], and the development of clinically relevant bone constructs still remains the major challenge [ 3 ]. Indeed, although a large number of materials have been fabricated for bone regeneration and significant progress continues to be made, only a very limited number of scaffolds have been clinically used [ 41 , 126 , 128 ]. The difficulties in fabricating scaffolds with personalized structures can also limit their clinical applications [ 45 ], along with the inappropriate osteogenic differentiation, vascularization and growth factor delivery exhibited by some techniques [ 11 ].…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation