2002
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.162124199
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomaterial adherent macrophage apoptosis is increased by hydrophilic and anionic substratesinvivo

Abstract: An in vivo rat cage implant system was used to identify potential surface chemistries that prevent failure of implanted biomedical devices and prostheses by limiting monocyte adhesion and macrophage fusion into foreign-body giant cells while inducing adherent-macrophage apoptosis. Hydrophobic, hydrophilic, anionic, and cationic surfaces were used for implantation. Analysis of the exudate surrounding the materials revealed no differences between surfaces in the types or levels of cells present. Conversely, the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

14
166
1
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 218 publications
(183 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(20 reference statements)
14
166
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Many studies have been performed in vitro and in vivo to evaluate the biocompatibility of PAAbased systems. A study by Brodbeck et al [95] demonstrated that PAA could prevent the failure of implanted biomedical devices by limiting macrophage fusion and monocyte adhesion in vivo using the rat cage implant system. Other studies [96,97] have also commented on the anti-corrosion performance of the PAA, the ability to functionalize such water-soluble polymers with bioactive molecules and their compatibility towards human osteoblast-like cells.…”
Section: Biocompatibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have been performed in vitro and in vivo to evaluate the biocompatibility of PAAbased systems. A study by Brodbeck et al [95] demonstrated that PAA could prevent the failure of implanted biomedical devices by limiting macrophage fusion and monocyte adhesion in vivo using the rat cage implant system. Other studies [96,97] have also commented on the anti-corrosion performance of the PAA, the ability to functionalize such water-soluble polymers with bioactive molecules and their compatibility towards human osteoblast-like cells.…”
Section: Biocompatibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…cell adhesion ͉ signaling ͉ osteoblast ͉ mineralization B iomaterial surface chemistry modulates in vitro and in vivo cellular responses, including adhesion, survival, cell cycle progression, and expression of differentiated phenotypes (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8). These cell-material interactions regulate cell and host responses to implanted devices, biological integration of biomaterials and tissue-engineered constructs, and the performance of cell arrays and biotechnological cell culture supports (9)(10)(11)(12).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These cell-material interactions regulate cell and host responses to implanted devices, biological integration of biomaterials and tissue-engineered constructs, and the performance of cell arrays and biotechnological cell culture supports (9)(10)(11)(12). For instance, anionic and neutral hydrophilic surfaces increase macrophage͞ monocyte apoptosis and reduce macrophage fusion to modulate inflammatory responses to implanted materials (8). The effects of biomaterial surface properties on cellular responses are generally attributed to material-dependent differences in adsorbed protein species, concentration, and͞or biological activity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, cell adhesion to orthopedic implant surfaces may regulate cell growth, proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis [25,26], and consequently impacts osseointegration; osseointegration requires secure and strong attachment and growth of bone cells on the surgically implanted devices [4,5]. In this study, we successfully incorporated RGD, a cell-adhesive ligand, TGF-β1, a growth factor, and gentamicin, a common antibiotic, into one single nanofilm on orthopedic implant models, and we showed that the incorporation of the three drugs could be controlled by tuning the preparation variables including the assembly layers and incubation time ( Figure 1B and 1C); the combination of these three drugs within a single nanofilm was intended to achieve improved cell adhesion and growth and meanwhile to inhibit implant-associated infection thereby achieving improved osseointegration and long-lasting implantation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%