2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.04.104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomass viability: An experimental study and the development of an empirical mathematical model for submerged membrane bioreactor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Deng et al (2014) noted that the added sponge can prevent cake formation and pore blockage in a submerged MBR that are mainly contributed by soluble microbial products in activated sludge. Zuthi et al (2015) developed a mathematical model for a sponge submerged membrane bioreactor considering the biomass viability and extra-cellular polymeric substances redundancy. The model was validated by experimental data and was used for making process performance prediction.…”
Section: External Additivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deng et al (2014) noted that the added sponge can prevent cake formation and pore blockage in a submerged MBR that are mainly contributed by soluble microbial products in activated sludge. Zuthi et al (2015) developed a mathematical model for a sponge submerged membrane bioreactor considering the biomass viability and extra-cellular polymeric substances redundancy. The model was validated by experimental data and was used for making process performance prediction.…”
Section: External Additivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existing MBR models are derived from activated sludge model (ASM) with a physical membrane filtration process (Ng and Kim 2007). Biomass kinetic models and membrane fouling models are major components to describe the MBR process (Diez et al 2014;Zuthi et al 2015). Development of MBER models will need to synergistically integrate MFC models with MBR models.…”
Section: Responsible Editor: Marcus Schulzmentioning
confidence: 99%