2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2015.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomass supply curves for western juniper in Central Oregon, USA, under alternative business models and policy assumptions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While we used $60 per ton as an example in our case study, any cost threshold can be applied to determine not only the amount of biomass available but also the location of that biomass on the landscape. In contrast to other regional and landscape-based models and estimates [41,42], our model and estimates are spatially explicit and applicable on tactical and project scales. They also facilitate landscape scale analyses, providing the flexibility and detail needed to address stand-level forest management scenarios and procurement planning for industrial facilities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While we used $60 per ton as an example in our case study, any cost threshold can be applied to determine not only the amount of biomass available but also the location of that biomass on the landscape. In contrast to other regional and landscape-based models and estimates [41,42], our model and estimates are spatially explicit and applicable on tactical and project scales. They also facilitate landscape scale analyses, providing the flexibility and detail needed to address stand-level forest management scenarios and procurement planning for industrial facilities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many studies, incentive has been used in a broad sense to include favorable government policy, tax credits, shared business interests, and improved operation schemes . In this study, incentive is defined in a much narrower sense as the payment biomass producers receive excluding nutrient replacement and all of the operating costs of field operations such as biomass harvest and collection .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another study, Golecha and Gan developed an optimal contracting structure between biorefineries and biomass suppliers by finding the trade‐off between different components of biomass cost including farm‐gate cost, biomass transport, incentives to suppliers, nutrient replacement, and financial impact (loss) to the biorefinery due to inadequate biomass availability. In other studies, the impact of the biomass supply and farm participation rate on the performance of the biomass supply chain has also been investigated …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This attention has been motivated by growing recognition of the role semiarid ecosystems may play in controlling interannual variation and longer-term trends in the global land carbon (C) sink (Strand et al, 2008;Poulter et al, 2014;Ahlström et al, 2015;Sleeter et al, 2018). There is also interest in the potential for dryland vegetation to provide bioenergy feedstock (Ansley et al, 2012;Lauer et al, 2015;Chen et al, 2016) and linkages between biomass and landscape fire dynamics (Romme et al, 2009;Archibald et al, 2018) alongside interactions of vegetation cover and land degradation processes (Hochstrasser et al, 2014;Puttock et al, 2014;Cunliffe et al, 2016b). Across the southwestern USA, juniper-dominated and codominant communities are both widespread, and expanding in extent (Manier et al, 2005;Hulet et al, 2014), in part due to human activities (Soulé et al, 2004;Briggs et al, 2007;Van Auken and Smeins, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%