2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.05.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomass production and nutrient removal by Chlorella sp. as affected by sludge liquor concentration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(57 reference statements)
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, it is interesting to note that the total biomass harvested growing C. vulgaris and Scenedesmus I in dA30W or dB5W is higher compared to previous results achieved by growing C. sorokiniana or Scenedesmus strains in diluted anaerobic digestate originating from cattle manure digestion or wastewater treatment, obtaining a final biomass concentration in the range of 0.25−0.36 g/L [39,54]. Although the results presented herein are lower compared to other reports where the cultivation of Chlorella strains on anaerobic digestates were performed with bubbling 3% CO 2 in the photobioreactors yielding biomass concentrations of up to 2 g/L [55], in this work the photobioreactors were bubbled with air. It is important also to consider that the anaerobic digestates analyzed here were autoclaved before use, since the main focus of this research work was to investigate if the nutrient composition of the different substrates was sufficient to sustain microalgal cultivation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Moreover, it is interesting to note that the total biomass harvested growing C. vulgaris and Scenedesmus I in dA30W or dB5W is higher compared to previous results achieved by growing C. sorokiniana or Scenedesmus strains in diluted anaerobic digestate originating from cattle manure digestion or wastewater treatment, obtaining a final biomass concentration in the range of 0.25−0.36 g/L [39,54]. Although the results presented herein are lower compared to other reports where the cultivation of Chlorella strains on anaerobic digestates were performed with bubbling 3% CO 2 in the photobioreactors yielding biomass concentrations of up to 2 g/L [55], in this work the photobioreactors were bubbled with air. It is important also to consider that the anaerobic digestates analyzed here were autoclaved before use, since the main focus of this research work was to investigate if the nutrient composition of the different substrates was sufficient to sustain microalgal cultivation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Several research studies were already performed with microalgal growth in wastewaters from different sources: (i) domestic wastewater [19][20][21]; (ii) anaerobic digestion wastewater [22][23][24]; (iii) livestock wastewater [25][26][27]; and (iv) agro-industrial wastewater [28,29]. In almost all studies, microalgae were able to efficiently remove the monitored nutrients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Published literature showed that the concentration of any one nutrient (either nitrate or phosphate) fluctuate at a time while other remains constant (Xin et al 2010, Arbib et al 2013, Samorı` et al 2013, Zhang & Hong 2014. Therefore, levels of both nutrients vary simultaneously without changing their ratios (Aslan & Kapdan 2006, Akerström et al 2014. At high levels of nitrate reduced absorption of phosphate from water has been reported (Pittman et al 2011, Craggs et al 2013.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%