2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jplph.2009.07.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomass partitioning, morphology and water status of four alfalfa genotypes submitted to progressive drought and subsequent recovery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

12
83
2
5

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
12
83
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Results showed that leaves, shoots and roots dry matters were reduced significantly mainly under severe stress levels (25% and 50% of field capacity). These results are similar to those obtained by Mauriè s (1994) and Erice et al (2010) indicating that water stress caused a significant reduction of the quantity of dry matter in the aboveground and below ground organs in alfalfa plants. These finding are the same also for many species such as pearl millet (Pennise tumglaucum L.) (Kusaka et al 2005), Phaseolus vulgaris (Ashraf & Iram 2005) and maize (Chimenti et al 2006).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Results showed that leaves, shoots and roots dry matters were reduced significantly mainly under severe stress levels (25% and 50% of field capacity). These results are similar to those obtained by Mauriè s (1994) and Erice et al (2010) indicating that water stress caused a significant reduction of the quantity of dry matter in the aboveground and below ground organs in alfalfa plants. These finding are the same also for many species such as pearl millet (Pennise tumglaucum L.) (Kusaka et al 2005), Phaseolus vulgaris (Ashraf & Iram 2005) and maize (Chimenti et al 2006).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…3). In addition, a decrease in the SLA (Table 3) was observed with respect to the control, indicating that leaves became smaller and thicker, in order to be more efficient for controlling water losses under water stress conditions [13]. Large decreases in shoot DM compared with root DM were observed under water stress, in accordance with Blum [45] and Munns and Tester [6].…”
Section: Water Stress Effectssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…One of the mechanisms associated with drought tolerance is the ability of a plant to retain cellular water under water deficit stress (Kumar et al 2004;Erice et al 2010). RWC is a physiological measurement of plant cellular water status influenced by both leaf water potential and osmotic adjustment (Barrs and Weatherley 1962).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leaf RWC is a reliable indicator of leaf water deficit status at the time of sampling. It is often used to examine the response of a plant to the progress of drought stress (Lafitte and Courtois 2002;Erice et al 2010). To determine the water status changes within plants after initiating drought stress, we measured leaf RWC of maize inbred lines at 4 days, 7 days, and 10 days of drought treatment in the MD, SD, and PD plots and compared these values with RWC of leaf tissue measured prior to treatment (0 days).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%