Biomass gasification in a circulating fluidized bed

Abstract

This work is devoted to the experimental study of biomass gasification in a pilot-scale circulating fluidized bed, and development of an equilibrium model of the process based on Gibbs free-energy minimization. Biomass gasification has considerable potential for reducing greenhouse gas emissions. In the present study, six types of sawdust were gasified in a pilotscale air-blown circulating fluidized bed gasifier to produce low-calorific-value gases. The pilot gasifier employs a riser 6.5 m high and 0.1 m in diameter, a high-temperature cyclone for solids recycle and a ceramic fibre filter unit for gas cleaning. The riser temperature was maintained at 970-1120 K (700-850°C), while the sawdust feed rate varied from 16-45 kg/h, corresponding to a superficial gas velocity of 4-10 m/s. It was found that gas composition and heating value depended heavily on the air or O/C ratio, and to a lesser extent on operating temperature. The higher heating value of the product gas decreased from 5.6 to 2.1 MJ/Nm 3 as the stoichiometric air ratio increased from 0.22 to 0.54. The gas heating value was increased by increasing the overall suspension density in the riser. Fly ash re-injection and steam injection led to increases in gas heating value for the same Q/C molar ratio. Tar yield from biomass gasification was found to decrease drastically from 15 to 0.54 g/Nin 3 as the average suspension temperature increased from 970 to 1090 K. Elevating the operating temperature provides the simplest solution for tar removal in the absence of any catalyst. Secondary air had only a very limited effect on tar removal with the total air ratio maintained constant. A nickel-based, catalyst proved to be effective in reducing the tar yield and in adjusting the gas composition. Ill The cold gas efficiency decreased with increasing air ratio (or O/C molar ratio), though the carbon conversion increased. The cold gas efficiency provides a better criterion for evaluating the gasification process than the carbon conversion. Experimental data showed that the gasification efficiency can be maximized within an optimum range of air ratio (a = 0.30-0.35, or O/C = 1.5-1.7), while keeping the tar yield acceptably low. A non-stoichiometric equilibrium model based on Gibbs free energy minimization was developed for biomass gasification. Five elements (C, H, O, N and S) and 44 species were considered in the model. Both pure equilibrium and situations where kinetic factors cause a partial approach to equilibrium are considered. The equilibrium model predicts that the product gas composition from gasification of woody biomass (e.g. sawdust) depends primarily on the air ratio. An air ratio of 0.2-0.3 is predicted to be most favourable for producing CO-rich gas, while temperatures of 1200-1400 K and an air ratio of 0.15-0.25 are predicted to be optimum for H 2 production. The predicted cold gas efficiency reached a maximum at an air ratio of about 0.25. The model successfully predicts the onset of carbon formation in a C-H-O-dominated system when the relative abundan...

Feasibility study into the potential for gasification plant in the New Zealand wood processing industry

“…Work by Li (2004) found this approach temperature to be 250 o C below the measured gasification temperature. Other work (Prins et al, 2007) has split these approach temperatures into the various reactions.…”

“…The reactants that would have formed methane have partly formed longer chain hydrocarbons instead as a result of incomplete cracking of pyrolysis products (X. T. Li et al, 2004).…”

Pyrolysis/reforming of rice husks with a Ni–dolomite catalyst: Influence of process conditions on syngas and hydrogen yield

“…This increase in H2 yield was most likely due to the water gas reaction, the water gas shift reaction, methane steam reforming reaction and steam reforming of tar hydrocarbon components [40].…”

The effect of air preheating in a biomass CFB gasifier using ASPEN Plus simulation

“…The main model assumptions are: steady state conditions, zero-dimensional model, isothermal (uniform bed temperature), drying and pyrolysis are instantaneous in a CFB [24,25], char is 100% carbon (graphite), all of the sulphur reacts to form H 2 S [6], only NH 3 formed no nitrogen oxides considered [6,12,23], cyclone separation efficiency is 85% [26], 2% carbon loss in ash [27], and heat loss from the gasifier is equal to 3% of the total heat input [16,28,29]. The function of the next block is to simulate carbon conversion by separating out a specified portion of the carbon from the fuel.…”