2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1354(02)00167-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomass development in slow sand filters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
52
0
12

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
5
52
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…After completion of the permeability experiments, dismantling of the spent BASSF specimens did not reveal growth of green algal mass in as was observed by Campos et al [18] in uncovered slow sand filter beds. The spent BASSF filter specimen (permeated with contaminated groundwater) is characterized by OM content of 4.2 %.…”
Section: Fig 1 Total Coliform and E Coli Removal By Bassfsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…After completion of the permeability experiments, dismantling of the spent BASSF specimens did not reveal growth of green algal mass in as was observed by Campos et al [18] in uncovered slow sand filter beds. The spent BASSF filter specimen (permeated with contaminated groundwater) is characterized by OM content of 4.2 %.…”
Section: Fig 1 Total Coliform and E Coli Removal By Bassfsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Relevant processes include adsorption, bio-oxidation, predation and scavenging. These processes have been hypothesized but have never been comprehensively verified [123,124]. Such a gap in knowledge pertaining to the optimal efficiency of SSFs hampers advances in their design.…”
Section: Biological Mediated Processes In Fe 0 Filtersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is believed that contaminant removal in SSF occurs mainly in the colmation layer or schmutzdecke -a biologically active layer or biofilm formed at the sand-water interface (Campos et al 2002).…”
Section: *Corresponding Authormentioning
confidence: 99%