1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-3820(97)00064-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomass cofiring: status and prospects 1996

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
47
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This could have implications at the operational scale: the blending of higher-rank (bituminous) coals with sawdust could translate into greater unburnt coal in the ashes because coal requires more combustion time to burn completely. This result agrees with that expressed some years ago by other authors, who recommended not using coal-biomass blends with over 20% biomass (Hughes and Tillman, 1998;Spliethoff and Hein, 1998) because of this operational consequence.…”
Section: Thermogravimetric Assayssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…This could have implications at the operational scale: the blending of higher-rank (bituminous) coals with sawdust could translate into greater unburnt coal in the ashes because coal requires more combustion time to burn completely. This result agrees with that expressed some years ago by other authors, who recommended not using coal-biomass blends with over 20% biomass (Hughes and Tillman, 1998;Spliethoff and Hein, 1998) because of this operational consequence.…”
Section: Thermogravimetric Assayssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…A number of efforts have been made to address the associated problems, for example: mixing the coal with co-fuel such as biomass [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16], refuse-derived fuel [5,6], tire-derived fuel [5,6] and plastics [6]. These efforts involved both pulverized and briquetted coals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…European research into direct firing and cofiring biomass with coal for power generation has been fairly extensive with various agricultural biomass fuels such as wheat straw and wood waste product fuels (8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13). In the United States, research has focused primarily on cofiring arrangements for wood (14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21), and more localized agricultural waste biomass fuels have been studied less intensely (22)(23)(24)(25)(26). Figure 1 shows the types of biomass that could be expected to be available for power production in various regions of the United States.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%