Treatise on Geochemistry 2014
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-08-095975-7.00405-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomass Burning: The Cycling of Gases and Particulates from the Biosphere to the Atmosphere

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(54 reference statements)
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(e) After the statistical analysis and verification about the certainty that the applied hot spots are real wildfires [29], the corresponding yearly mean of affected area was assigned to every hot spot.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(e) After the statistical analysis and verification about the certainty that the applied hot spots are real wildfires [29], the corresponding yearly mean of affected area was assigned to every hot spot.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(f) Information on biomass load and biomass burning efficiencies for six types of vegetation was collected [29] (Table 1). For other combined vegetation types, average values for biomass load and burning efficiencies were calculated from the original components.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four simulations with varied emission setups (Table 1) are used to derive the instantaneous forcing by the interaction of mineral dust and anthropogenic pollution: one simulation considering all emissions (simulation 1), the same simulation but without dust emissions (simulation 2), a simulation with only natural emissions (simulation 3) and the corresponding simulation without dust emissions (simulations 4). For the natural emission setups we omit the CMIP5 anthropogenic emissions and reduce the GFED biomass burning emissions by 90 % (Levine, 2014). All dust emissions are considered to be natural, hence the anthropogenic impacts of land use and climate change on the dust emissions (Klingmüller et al, 2016) are excluded from our analysis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This information is important due to the volatilization of nutrients during the burning practice in every harvested period. The IPCC's methodologies estimate the greenhouse gas emissions, although other proposals, for example, the Seiler and Crutzen methodology [22], are very useful to know the amount of carbon and nitrogen released to the atmosphere during the burning of some crops.…”
Section: Co 2 Emissions During the Harvest Of Sugarcane In The Major mentioning
confidence: 99%