The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2016
DOI: 10.1515/bot-2015-0075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomass and productivity of seagrasses in Africa

Abstract: There is growing interest in carbon stocks and flows in seagrass ecosystems, but recent global reviews suggest a paucity of studies from Africa. This paper reviews work on seagrass productivity, biomass and sediment carbon in Africa. Most work was conducted in East Africa with a major geographical gap in West Africa. The mean above-ground, below-ground and total biomasses from all studies were 174.4, 474.6 and 514 g DW m -2 , respectively with a global range of 461-738 g DW m -2 . Mean annual production rate w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
15
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Fig. 4 is based on the maximum values of three resistance proxies and three recovery measures found in the literature for each genera, normalized against the maximum overall Table S5); B) Rhizome diameter (Duarte, 1991a); C) Shoot weight (Brouns and Heijs, 1986;Duarte, 1991a;Edgar and Robertson, 1992;Ramírez-García et al, 1998); D) Total biomass (Duarte and Chiscano, 1999;Githaiga et al, 2016;Menéndez, 2002;Paling and McComb, 2000); E) Seed density (Kim et al, 2015;Orth et al, 2006b); F) Rhizome extension rate (Duarte, 1991a;Marba and Duarte, 1998;Wortmann et al, 1998); G) Leaf turnover rate (Duarte, 1991a;Vonk et al, 2015); H) Above: below ground biomass ratio (Duarte and Chiscano, 1999;Githaiga et al, 2016). Genera are classified as persistent, colonizing and/or opportunistic as per Kilminster et al (2015).…”
Section: Resistance Recovery and Seagrass Life History Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig. 4 is based on the maximum values of three resistance proxies and three recovery measures found in the literature for each genera, normalized against the maximum overall Table S5); B) Rhizome diameter (Duarte, 1991a); C) Shoot weight (Brouns and Heijs, 1986;Duarte, 1991a;Edgar and Robertson, 1992;Ramírez-García et al, 1998); D) Total biomass (Duarte and Chiscano, 1999;Githaiga et al, 2016;Menéndez, 2002;Paling and McComb, 2000); E) Seed density (Kim et al, 2015;Orth et al, 2006b); F) Rhizome extension rate (Duarte, 1991a;Marba and Duarte, 1998;Wortmann et al, 1998); G) Leaf turnover rate (Duarte, 1991a;Vonk et al, 2015); H) Above: below ground biomass ratio (Duarte and Chiscano, 1999;Githaiga et al, 2016). Genera are classified as persistent, colonizing and/or opportunistic as per Kilminster et al (2015).…”
Section: Resistance Recovery and Seagrass Life History Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seagrass beds mixed with macroalgae cover both the creeks and the bay up to the seaward mouth (Githaiga et al, 2016). Thalassodendron ciliatum, Cymodocea serrulata, C. rotundata and Enhalus acoroides are among the most abundant seagrass species, while Sargassum binderi, Dictyota cervicornis, and Turbinaria conoides are among the most abundant brown and Gracilaria corticata and Hypnea cornuta among the most abundant red macroalgae.…”
Section: Study Area and Sample Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to other blue carbon sinks, there is less research focusing on seagrass carbon dynamics, leading to uncertainties in the seagrass habitat extent and contribution to the blue carbon budget. In the African coastline for example, there is still a huge paucity of information regarding seagrass habitat extent, quantitative carbon estimates, and habitat influence despite the extensive meadows (Githaiga et al, 2016(Githaiga et al, , 2017.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%