The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2017.02.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomass and InSAR height relationship in a dense tropical forest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
39
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
5
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These factors, as well as information on the elevation of the ground, need to be considered when estimating biomass from the InSAR height. Several research papers demonstrated that simple linear relationships could predict biomass from estimates of InSAR height of single-pass datasets [35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42]. Nevertheless, it is unclear whether such linear models that were validated at a number of test sites in boreal and savannah forest apply in other forest ecosystems as well [42].…”
Section: Retrieval Of Biomass Using Insar Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These factors, as well as information on the elevation of the ground, need to be considered when estimating biomass from the InSAR height. Several research papers demonstrated that simple linear relationships could predict biomass from estimates of InSAR height of single-pass datasets [35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42]. Nevertheless, it is unclear whether such linear models that were validated at a number of test sites in boreal and savannah forest apply in other forest ecosystems as well [42].…”
Section: Retrieval Of Biomass Using Insar Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several research papers demonstrated that simple linear relationships could predict biomass from estimates of InSAR height of single-pass datasets [35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42]. Nevertheless, it is unclear whether such linear models that were validated at a number of test sites in boreal and savannah forest apply in other forest ecosystems as well [42]. An advanced solution having more potential for generalization is given by physically-based models, such as Equation (3), which take into account the sensitivity of the InSAR elevation to baseline and by a combination of single-images estimates of biomass with a multi-temporal combination [40].…”
Section: Retrieval Of Biomass Using Insar Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Neeff et al [20] obtained a similar relationship for a virgin rainforest in Brazil. Gama et al [21] obtained a curvilinear relationship, while for African tropical forests Solberg et al [15,17] obtained noisier results having RMSE values of 40 t·ha −1 (78% of the mean AGB) and 203 t·ha −1 (44% of the mean AGB) in Tanzanian miombo woodlands and dense tropical forests, respectively. The latter cases suffered from small and few field inventory plots, not taking into account the large size of single trees in those forests, thus the applicability of models like Equation (1) remains uncertain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In the case where a high quality DTM is available it has been demonstrated that forest height and biomass can be estimated either based on the height of the phase centre above the ground [9] or based on a more sophisticated approach utilizing the ground-corrected complex coherence [10]. Although the height of the phase centre in a tropical forest appears to be fairly stable between acquisitions [11], weather conditions, phenology [12][13][14], terrain steepness and ascending or descending mode acquisitions can cause differences in height [15]. One particular approach to overcome these limitations is to monitor height changes rather than heights, which would not require a DTM, and to combine several acquisitions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%