2015
DOI: 10.3109/02699206.2015.1014572
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomarkers of “Linguistic Anxiety” in aphasia: A proof-of-concept case study

Abstract: This is a proof-of-concept case study designed to evaluate the presence of "Linguistic Anxiety" in a person with mild aphasia. The participant (aged 68) was tested on linguistic and non-linguistic cognitive tasks administered under conditions that differed in levels of anxiety. A validated anxiety-induction technique rarely used in previous aphasia studies was employed: the participant was instructed to prepare for a public speaking presentation. Measures of linguistic and non-linguistic cognitive performance,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cahana-Amitay et al, 2011); however, empirical support is lacking for general anxiety associated with language use (see Laures-Gore & Buchanan, 2015). Alternatively, the heightened anxiety may be more context-specific: An everyday communication situation that is perceived as challenging by neurotypical adults, for example secondary to attentional demands, may be perceived as threatening by PWA, leading to a heightened neurovisceral response (Laures-Gore & Buchanan, 2015) and potentially affecting spoken language (see e.g., Cahana-Amitay et al, 2015) and life participation. Individual differences related to overall health, energy, and coping resources are likely to mediate the indvididual response (see framework presented in Laures-Gore & Buchanan, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cahana-Amitay et al, 2011); however, empirical support is lacking for general anxiety associated with language use (see Laures-Gore & Buchanan, 2015). Alternatively, the heightened anxiety may be more context-specific: An everyday communication situation that is perceived as challenging by neurotypical adults, for example secondary to attentional demands, may be perceived as threatening by PWA, leading to a heightened neurovisceral response (Laures-Gore & Buchanan, 2015) and potentially affecting spoken language (see e.g., Cahana-Amitay et al, 2015) and life participation. Individual differences related to overall health, energy, and coping resources are likely to mediate the indvididual response (see framework presented in Laures-Gore & Buchanan, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary aim of Study 1 was to determine how communication partner responsiveness affects ratings of psychological stress and measures of spoken language accuracy and speed for people with aphasia. Based on previous findings, we hypothesized that participants would report greater psychological stress and decreased fluency when retelling a story to an unresponsive communication partner (Buchanan, Laures-Gore, & Duff, 2014;Cahana-Amitay et al, 2015;Lepore et al, 1993). Based on qualitative findings suggesting that people with aphasia react negatively to unresponsive partners (Le Dorze et al, 2014;Parr, 2001;Skelly, 1975), we suspected they would experience greater psychological stress than control participants.…”
Section: Spoken Languagementioning
confidence: 97%
“…Based on qualitative findings suggesting that people with aphasia react negatively to unresponsive partners (Le Dorze et al, 2014;Parr, 2001;Skelly, 1975), we suspected they would experience greater psychological stress than control participants. We thought that this might lead to even greater spoken language interference for people with aphasia than controls (Cahana-Amitay et al, 2015).…”
Section: Spoken Languagementioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This means that in clinical settings, the existing language deficits might be reinforced by the anxiety reaction which may lead to inaccurate conclusions about the clinical profile and severity of aphasia and the effectiveness of therapeutic interventions. Intriguingly, despite the relevance and potential clinical implications of LA, very few studies have addressed its impact on language performance in the aphasic population (Laures-Gore et al, 2007; Cahana-Amitay et al, 2015; Laures-Gore and Buchanan, 2015). In addition, there is limited evidence on the contributing factors (e.g., premorbid personality traits, lesion location) and the behavioral, psychological and physiological characteristics of anxiety response in PWA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%