2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ccm.2009.08.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomarkers of Disease Activity, Cure, and Relapse in Tuberculosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 126 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Contacts with greater response to ESAT6 (presumably at greater risk for developing active TB) (36) had higher expression of TNF and Fas, similar to active TB cases. This is consistent with other studies among active cases of TB, in which severe cases were associated with a greater ratio of TNF to TNFR1 (79, 80). The authors suggest these parameters in household contacts are a measure of active infection rather than latency.…”
Section: Immunologic Distinctions Of Active Disease and Latent Infectsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Contacts with greater response to ESAT6 (presumably at greater risk for developing active TB) (36) had higher expression of TNF and Fas, similar to active TB cases. This is consistent with other studies among active cases of TB, in which severe cases were associated with a greater ratio of TNF to TNFR1 (79, 80). The authors suggest these parameters in household contacts are a measure of active infection rather than latency.…”
Section: Immunologic Distinctions Of Active Disease and Latent Infectsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The diagnostic tests in common usage today merely measure whether or not an individual has mounted an immune response to Mtb. Given that progression to disease is determined locally, at the level of the individual granuloma, it is unclear if we will ever be able to develop biomarkers for disease progression based on systemic readouts of immune status (58). Recent advances in PET and CT-based imaging modalities have the potential to fill this gap (Fig.…”
Section: Missing Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is unclear if there is any difference between the systemic immune response in an individual harboring a controlled, persistent infection, versus one with active disease. Certainly programs attempting to identify systemic biomarkers of disease state have met with extremely limited success (Doherty et al, 2009; Wallis et al, 2009). While this has serious implications for monitoring disease progress, or understanding why one granuloma becomes active while others resolve, it has even greater significance for vaccine development because it implies that the best immune response leads to nothing better than containment.…”
Section: Heterogeneity Across the Infectionmentioning
confidence: 99%