2022
DOI: 10.1164/rccm.202202-0373oc
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomarkers of Airway Immune Homeostasis Differ Significantly with Generation of E-Cigarettes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
16
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
3
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although one may conclude that these data support that the use of fourth generation ENDS as being ‘safer’ for human health compared to the use of tank-style ENDS devices, thus far, human and experimental evidence show differential responses following exposures to these distinct types of ENDS devices. It was recently shown it a study using sputum of smokers, third-generation e-cig users, fourth-generation e-cig users, and non-smokers (controls), that the use of fourth-generation ENDS, containing high nicotine salt levels (35 to 59 mg/mL), induced a distinct suppressive immune disruptive pattern in the lungs compared to the use of ENDS from previous generations and even from cigarettes [ 4 ]. Thus, it was proposed that nicotine salt drove the immunosuppressive responses in the lungs [ 4 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although one may conclude that these data support that the use of fourth generation ENDS as being ‘safer’ for human health compared to the use of tank-style ENDS devices, thus far, human and experimental evidence show differential responses following exposures to these distinct types of ENDS devices. It was recently shown it a study using sputum of smokers, third-generation e-cig users, fourth-generation e-cig users, and non-smokers (controls), that the use of fourth-generation ENDS, containing high nicotine salt levels (35 to 59 mg/mL), induced a distinct suppressive immune disruptive pattern in the lungs compared to the use of ENDS from previous generations and even from cigarettes [ 4 ]. Thus, it was proposed that nicotine salt drove the immunosuppressive responses in the lungs [ 4 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was recently shown it a study using sputum of smokers, third-generation e-cig users, fourth-generation e-cig users, and non-smokers (controls), that the use of fourth-generation ENDS, containing high nicotine salt levels (35 to 59 mg/mL), induced a distinct suppressive immune disruptive pattern in the lungs compared to the use of ENDS from previous generations and even from cigarettes [ 4 ]. Thus, it was proposed that nicotine salt drove the immunosuppressive responses in the lungs [ 4 ]. This contrasts with the presence of high aldehyde levels found in third-generation ENDS aerosols, which are known to affect cytotoxicity, inflammation and oxidative stress pathways in lung cells [ 13 , 37 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…37 This clustering approach was implemented to identify groups of cytokines with concerted response profiles across exposure conditions, as previously described. 41,42 Correlation Analysis between Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) and Cytokine Levels. We used the PAH levels present in the smoldering and flaming condenstaes 15 and the cytokine levels to perform Spearman's rank correlation tests using the psych package 43 in R (v 4.3.2).…”
Section: Statistical Analysis Of Cytokine and Gene Expressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Limitations of Hickman's study include over-representation of males within the 4 th generation e-cigarette group, which the authors controlled for in their analysis. Beyond classifying ecigarette users by generation of device, the e-cigarette groups were not further characterized with regards to flavor, frequency or chronicity of use, or concomitant use of marijuanacontaining products 8 . This limitation highlights a challenge for the tobacco research community at large, to develop high quality, common survey instruments to accurately quantify concomitant combustible tobacco and marijuana use, as well as types, flavors and frequency of e-cigarettes and e-liquids used.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%