2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10006-021-01026-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomarkers involved in the proliferation of the odontogenic keratocyst, glandular odontogenic cyst and botryoid odontogenic cyst

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The vast majority of studies (24 out of 29) reported experiments on FFPE tissue samples ( Table S3 ), two studies included both fresh-frozen and FFPE samples [ 6 , 39 ], one study reviewed only fresh-frozen samples [ 42 ], and in vitro analysis of human odontogenic lesion-derived cells was performed in two studies [ 43 , 47 ]. A minority of studies (10 out of 29) documented the microscopic diagnosis of included odontogenic entities, either by providing a detailed microscopic description [ 6 , 11 , 12 , 29 , 35 ] or by mentioning an appropriate reference [ 13 , 32 , 36 , 37 , 39 ], e.g., the WHO 2017 [ 1 ] or 2005 [ 51 ] editions for odontogenic tumors and cysts.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The vast majority of studies (24 out of 29) reported experiments on FFPE tissue samples ( Table S3 ), two studies included both fresh-frozen and FFPE samples [ 6 , 39 ], one study reviewed only fresh-frozen samples [ 42 ], and in vitro analysis of human odontogenic lesion-derived cells was performed in two studies [ 43 , 47 ]. A minority of studies (10 out of 29) documented the microscopic diagnosis of included odontogenic entities, either by providing a detailed microscopic description [ 6 , 11 , 12 , 29 , 35 ] or by mentioning an appropriate reference [ 13 , 32 , 36 , 37 , 39 ], e.g., the WHO 2017 [ 1 ] or 2005 [ 51 ] editions for odontogenic tumors and cysts.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…OCT4 was negative [ 28 ] or focally expressed in the superficial epithelial layer [ 32 ] or in a few stromal cells of OKC [ 10 ], whereas one study employing a polyclonal anti-OCT4 antibody reported 100% positivity in OKC [ 31 ]. In contrast, six studies agreed on the strong nuclear expression of the SOX2 protein in OKC epithelial cells, mainly in the basal and/or intermediate layers [ 28 , 32 , 33 , 36 , 37 , 42 ], while one study showed SOX2 stromal positivity [ 10 ]. In addition, SOX2 RNA was significantly upregulated compared with AMBL or DF, according to a microarray-based [ 42 ] and an RNA-Seq-based study [ 37 ], respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, another diagnosis approach was proposed in relation to immunohistochemistry and biomarkers—Maruyama et al observed that CK13 was exclusively expressed in GOC lesions in comparison to central mucoepidermoid carcinoma, while CK17 expression was related to malignancies [ 12 ]. Moreover, Junior et al [ 25 ] compared the expression of three different biomarkers of GOC, odontogenic keratocyst and botryoid odontogenic cyst and found that high expression of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) was related to botryoid odontogenic cysts and GOCs presented higher expression of nuclear Cyclin D1. Furthermore, Kaplan et al suggest that Ki-67 and p53 biomarkers can help in differentiating GOC from low-grade mucoepidermoid carcinoma [ 24 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though the results are partially promising, the exact molecular mechanism of invasion in ameloblastomas is not completely understood. 6 Cell motility is essential for tumor invasion and subsequent dissemination or metastases. This increase in motility occurs via the modulation of actin filaments to form finger-like plasma membrane protrusions termed invadopodia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Literature review reveals many preliminary observations with no concrete evidence of a single marker being specific to these tumors and hence there is a need to determine new markers. 6 In this study, we have employed two markers: fascin and SALL4. Fascin, a 55-kDa is a cytoskeleton binding proteins that bundle actin filaments, assists the cell in forming stress fibres (or ruffled borders or micro spikes) and assists cell motility and migration hence it fascin can be used for predicting the aggressive clinical course of a tumor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%