2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.nurt.2009.10.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomarkers for the Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Evaluation of Treatment Efficacy for Traumatic Brain Injury

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
137
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 177 publications
(141 citation statements)
references
References 151 publications
3
137
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…CSF and serum levels of these markers have been shown to increase after moderate-tosevere TBI, presumably as a result of tissue damage and their release into the circulating fluid. 54,55 We examined whether or not the tissue level of GFAP and UCHL1 were affected by mild TBI. Our findings, illustrated in Figure 9, showed that there was a delayed increase in cortical tissue GFAP after mFPI, consistent with reports of elevated GFAP after a diffuse mild injury.…”
Section: Mtbi Pathway Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CSF and serum levels of these markers have been shown to increase after moderate-tosevere TBI, presumably as a result of tissue damage and their release into the circulating fluid. 54,55 We examined whether or not the tissue level of GFAP and UCHL1 were affected by mild TBI. Our findings, illustrated in Figure 9, showed that there was a delayed increase in cortical tissue GFAP after mFPI, consistent with reports of elevated GFAP after a diffuse mild injury.…”
Section: Mtbi Pathway Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, studies available on candidate biomarkers that can possibly be used to diagnose TBI and predict post-injury functional outcome provide no information on whether the TBI biomarkers could be used as PTE biomarkers [61,62].…”
Section: Biomarkers For Epileptogenesis After Brain Injurymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite there being a number of biomarkers that have been shown to correlate with injury magnitude and survivability (5,13), there are few reliable methods to predict the clinical outcomes for TBI patients; therefore, there is a desperate need to identify more specific and sensitive biomarkers to serve as parameters for TBI management and prognosis.…”
Section: Travmatik Beyin Hasarının Prognozuyla Ventriküler Beyin Omurmentioning
confidence: 99%