2008
DOI: 10.1007/s11373-008-9253-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomarkers for human radiation exposure

Abstract: There is a concern over the potential use of radioactive isotopes as a weapon of terror. The detonation of a radiation dispersal device, the so-called "dirty bomb" can lead to public panic. In order to estimate risks associated with radiation exposure, it is important to understand the biological effects of radiation exposure. Based on this knowledge, biomarkers to monitor potentially exposed populations after a radiological accident can be developed and would be extremely valuable for emergency response. Whil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
62
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
62
1
Order By: Relevance
“…3). Previously suggested 102 biomarkers for radiation were evaluated in the present dataset (Table 3) [7,8,21,22]. The majority of these genes (88/102) were not detected at any absorbed dose level in our data, and none of the gene was detected at all absorbed dose levels.…”
Section: Biomarkers For Radiation Exposurementioning
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3). Previously suggested 102 biomarkers for radiation were evaluated in the present dataset (Table 3) [7,8,21,22]. The majority of these genes (88/102) were not detected at any absorbed dose level in our data, and none of the gene was detected at all absorbed dose levels.…”
Section: Biomarkers For Radiation Exposurementioning
confidence: 55%
“…Transcriptional profiling with microarrays enables detection of global mRNA variation in tissues in a single experiment. The majority of studies using genome-wide approaches have been performed in vitro using gamma radiation and often at few absorbed dose levels or temporal points [7,8]. In contrast, studies performed in vivo have demonstrated complex and distinct dosedependent cellular responses following irradiation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The differential expression of 56 radiation-associated genes proposed by Snyder and Morgan (15) and Chaudhry (16) showed low response levels at 24 h after 211 At injection. Only 19 genes showed significant regulation at least in 1 tissue (Fig.…”
Section: Regulation Of Radiation-associated Genesmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The microarray assay facilitates a genome-wide study on transcriptional gene regulation in response to stimulus without the risk of excluding regulatory pathways by focusing on a designated set of genes for detecting a presupposed response (13,14). Furthermore, most studies focusing on radiation-induced transcriptional changes for the establishment of biomarkers have been performed in vitro (15,16). This gap in basic knowledge and the increasing interest in 211 At for radionuclide therapy demand further research in the field of normal-tissue damage, which offers a new venue for optimizing treatment protocols and improving acute and long-term risk assessment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these studies used blood cells (peripheral blood mononuclear cells, whole blood, cultured lymphocytes) for radiation doses between 0.5 and 10 Gy, over a time period between 4 and 24 h. Again, from these studies it is evident that genes involved in p53-regulated pathways are the best suited predictors of radiation exposure [160,[164][165][166][167][168][169]. Whether this would also be the case for other cell types or tissues, remains to be investigated.…”
Section: Biomarkers Related To Changes In Rna Levelsmentioning
confidence: 99%