2012
DOI: 10.3109/1354750x.2011.651157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomarkers for genome instability in some genetic disorders: a pilot study

Abstract: The results indicate that the estimates of DNA damage response may be proposed as efficient biomarkers for detecting and characterizing genome instability in the genetic disorders under study.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many studies regarding increased DNA damage in DS are in agreement with the observations of the present study. [ 8 11 41 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many studies regarding increased DNA damage in DS are in agreement with the observations of the present study. [ 8 11 41 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genome integrity in FA and DS has diagnostic and prognostic importance because of the evident relationship between genome instability and both DNA damage and cancer predisposition. [ 11 ] DNA damage is detected by Comet assay represented by an increase of DNA fragments that have migrated out of the cell nucleus in the form of a characteristic streak similar to the tail of a comet. [ 12 ]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate repair efficiency of 4OHE2-induced DNA damage PBLs were washed twice with RPMI by centrifugation followed by incubation in fresh RPMI medium for 2 h at 37 °C. DNA repair efficiency (DRE) was estimated as the percent of eliminated DNA damage relative to their induced level as described by Savina et al [20] in the following modification: DRE = [(% tail DNA after 4OHE2 treatment -% tail DNA after repair )/% tail DNA after 4OHE2 treatment ] × 100%, where % tail DNA after 4OHE2 treatment is % tail DNA after 17 h of PBLs incubation in RPMI with 4OHE2; % tail DNA after repair is % tail DNA after washing PBLs with RPMI and incubation in fresh RPMI medium.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Th e second point is that genomic instability has been estimated by using the net frequency of MN as a biomarker of genomic instability. Diff erent biomarkers have been proposed such as the use of the classical chromosomal aberration (Church et al 2012), telomere shortening (Moreno-Palomo et al 2014, Th omay et al 2014 or comet assay (Savina et al 2012); nevertheless, MN has a great biological relevance since it represents fi xed genetic damage resulting from both aneugenic and clastogenic mechanisms (Fenech 2007) and it is considered as a good surrogate marker of cancer risk (Bonassi et al 2011). Th e usefulness of the MN assay to evaluate individual ionizing radiation sensitivity has been reported to determine the intrinsic sensitivity to ionizing radiation in cancer patients, as well as in human immunodefi ciency virus (HIV)-positive individuals (Baeyens et al 2002, Mozdarani et al 2005, Christiakov et al 2008, Vral et al 2011, Bhatia and Kumar 2013.…”
Section: Declaration Of Interestmentioning
confidence: 99%