2005
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2005.07.559
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomarker Changes During Neoadjuvant Anastrozole, Tamoxifen, or the Combination: Influence of Hormonal Status and HER-2 in Breast Cancer—A Study from the IMPACT Trialists

Abstract: These results confirm the value of Ki67 as a molecular marker, and provide information regarding the relationships between treatment-induced changes in Ki67 and other important biomarkers. Studies such as this should help integrate agents targeted at growth factor signaling with endocrine agents in breast cancer.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

26
177
0
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 261 publications
(206 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
26
177
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, measurements of Ki67 in individual cases do not accurately predict for subsequent pathological (or clinical) response. A similar lack of prediction between Ki67 changes and clinical response to anastrozole has been observed in the recently reported IMPACT neoadjuvant trial (Dowsett et al, 2005a) (although the short-term changes in proliferation did parallel recurrence-free survival between the three treatment groups, anastrozole, tamoxifen and Arimidex combined with tamoxifen) (Dowsett et al, 2005b). As a consequence, consideration therefore needs to be given as to why clear decreases in cellular proliferation at 10 -14 days do not translate into pathological response and why conversely responding cases can show no change or even an increase in Ki67 with treatment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Consequently, measurements of Ki67 in individual cases do not accurately predict for subsequent pathological (or clinical) response. A similar lack of prediction between Ki67 changes and clinical response to anastrozole has been observed in the recently reported IMPACT neoadjuvant trial (Dowsett et al, 2005a) (although the short-term changes in proliferation did parallel recurrence-free survival between the three treatment groups, anastrozole, tamoxifen and Arimidex combined with tamoxifen) (Dowsett et al, 2005b). As a consequence, consideration therefore needs to be given as to why clear decreases in cellular proliferation at 10 -14 days do not translate into pathological response and why conversely responding cases can show no change or even an increase in Ki67 with treatment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…PR LI was also significantly (PZ0.046) decreased after the exemestane therapy (39 (0-76) % before the therapy and 20 (0-67) % after the therapy), as previously reported in the anastrozole treatment (Dowsett et al 2005a). On the other hand, ER LI, AR LI, and HER2 status were not significantly different in each case between before and after the exemestane therapy in this study (PZ0.42, PZ0.16, and PZ0.56 respectively).…”
Section: Immunolocalization Of Sex Steroid-related Enzymes In Breast supporting
confidence: 66%
“…The target study size was 40 patients but difficulties with competing studies led to its termination after 25 patients. This curtailment of the study inevitably led to loss of statistical power but the data analyzed allowed instructive comparisons with earlier presurgical studies of aromatase inhibitors to be made [40][41][42][43].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%