2018
DOI: 10.1017/s0033291718001307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomarker-based subtyping of depression and anxiety disorders using Latent Class Analysis. A NESDA study

Abstract: The identified classes were strongly tied to general (metabolic) health, and did not reflect any natural cutoffs along the lines of the traditional diagnostic classifications. Our analyses suggested that especially poor metabolic health could be seen as a distal marker for depression and anxiety, suggesting a relationship between the 'overweight' subtype and internalizing psychopathology.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
24
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
3
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Making generalized statements about depression is difficult when one considers the plethora of different depressive subtypes described in the literature which are characterized by distinct symptomatologies. It might be worthwhile to use biological differences as a springboard for defining depression subtypes based on biomarker profile analysis utilizing latent class analysis [445]. [47,53,93,446], the peripheral cytokine profile should not be considered a simple reflection of what is happening in the brain since peripheral cytokines are strongly influenced by several extra-central nervous system (CNS) variables.…”
Section: Heterogeneitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Making generalized statements about depression is difficult when one considers the plethora of different depressive subtypes described in the literature which are characterized by distinct symptomatologies. It might be worthwhile to use biological differences as a springboard for defining depression subtypes based on biomarker profile analysis utilizing latent class analysis [445]. [47,53,93,446], the peripheral cytokine profile should not be considered a simple reflection of what is happening in the brain since peripheral cytokines are strongly influenced by several extra-central nervous system (CNS) variables.…”
Section: Heterogeneitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is however mostly informed by knowledge of reference values in patients suspected of, or known to have, these disorders (16)(17)(18). For psychiatric disorders such as major depressive disorder, biomarker research has mostly involved plasma rather than CSF analysis (8,19,20) and the few studies investigating CSF biochemistry have frequently produced inconsistent results (21,22).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our study, the routinely measured laboratory variables and vital signs were used to identify subphenotypes, making our results generalizable to other institutions. Subphenotypes of a disease are usually explored by using genomic information or biomarkers that were not routinely obtained in clinical practice [ 32 , 33 ]. Although these studies provide more in-depth insights into the underlying pathophysiology of each distinct subphenotype, their clinical utility is limited due to unavailability of these novel biomarkers or transcriptomics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%