Shallow Lakes ’95 1997
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-011-5648-6_37
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomanipulation in shallow lakes: state of the art

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
97
0
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
5
97
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Consumption by age 0 yellow bass was 12 to 47% of annual zooplankton production, likely limiting zooplankton abundance. This is similar to other shallow lake systems where zooplanktivorous fish (e.g., age 0 yellow perch) suppress zooplankton, thereby limiting lake restoration success, (Perrow et al, 1995(Perrow et al, , 1996. In Clear Lake, zebra mussels may increase the likelihood of successful lake restoration by compensating for reduced zooplankton abundance due to age 0 yellow bass predation.…”
Section: Food Web and Lake Restorationsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Consumption by age 0 yellow bass was 12 to 47% of annual zooplankton production, likely limiting zooplankton abundance. This is similar to other shallow lake systems where zooplanktivorous fish (e.g., age 0 yellow perch) suppress zooplankton, thereby limiting lake restoration success, (Perrow et al, 1995(Perrow et al, , 1996. In Clear Lake, zebra mussels may increase the likelihood of successful lake restoration by compensating for reduced zooplankton abundance due to age 0 yellow bass predation.…”
Section: Food Web and Lake Restorationsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…The B nuisance was bounded between 220 and 550 kg/ha so that the biomanipulation events did not occur too frequently (i.e., every year); the upper bound represented the maximum of recent biomass estimates. Scenario 2 (the first biomanipulation scenario) used a pulsed proportional reduction of 0.75 when biomass exceeded B nuisance (Perrow et al 1995;Hansson et al 1998). Scenario 3 (the second biomanipulation scenario) employed a pulsed reduction of biomass to 100 kg/ha (Mehner et al 2004;Bajer et al 2009) when B nuisance was exceeded.…”
Section: Simulation Of Management Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By controlling nuisance fish populations, piscivores can induce a trophic cascade that leads to improved water quality, recovery of sport fish populations, and increased biological diversity (Carpenter et al 1985;Kitchell 1992;Lathrop et al 2002). Unfortunately, the biological control of common carp biomass by use of predation has not been successful without prior biomanipulation (Perrow et al 1995;Mehner et al 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…reduction in the nutrients input) and top-down procedures, where the higher trophic levels are manipulated (i.e. stocking of piscivorous fish, removal of plancktivorous fish) (PERROW et al, 1997). One of the first steps in the processes of top-down biomanipulation is the knowledge of the trophic function of the key species that compose the system (PERROW et al, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%