2013
DOI: 10.1038/ijos.2013.36
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biology of tooth replacement in amniotes

Abstract: Tooth replacement is a common trait to most vertebrates, including mammals. Mammals, however, have lost the capacity for continuous tooth renewal seen in most other vertebrates, and typically have only 1–2 generations of teeth. Here, we review the mechanisms of tooth replacement in reptiles and mammals, and discuss in detail the current and historical theories on control of timing and pattern of tooth replacement and development.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
51
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(65 reference statements)
0
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These waves of replacement, first described by Woerdeman (1921), are known as Zahnreihen and are a phenomenon that has been confirmed subsequently (in adult specimens at least) for fossil and extant taxa by several authors (e.g. Edmund, 1960Edmund, , 1969Hopson, 1980;DeMar & Bolt, 1981;de Ricql es & Bolt, 1983;Kieser et al 1993;Small, 1997;Delgado et al 2003), but see a review by Whitlock & Richman (2013) for other hypotheses. In most reptiles, replacement teeth develop directly lingually to the corresponding functional teeth and lie in resorption pits at the bases of the latter, whereupon the attachment is resorbed, the functional tooth is lost and the replacement tooth takes its place.…”
Section: Tooth Replacement In Reptilesmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…These waves of replacement, first described by Woerdeman (1921), are known as Zahnreihen and are a phenomenon that has been confirmed subsequently (in adult specimens at least) for fossil and extant taxa by several authors (e.g. Edmund, 1960Edmund, , 1969Hopson, 1980;DeMar & Bolt, 1981;de Ricql es & Bolt, 1983;Kieser et al 1993;Small, 1997;Delgado et al 2003), but see a review by Whitlock & Richman (2013) for other hypotheses. In most reptiles, replacement teeth develop directly lingually to the corresponding functional teeth and lie in resorption pits at the bases of the latter, whereupon the attachment is resorbed, the functional tooth is lost and the replacement tooth takes its place.…”
Section: Tooth Replacement In Reptilesmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Whitlock & Richman () reviewed tooth replacement mechanisms. The dental lamina plays a key role in this process (Järvinen et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pattern of implantation of baleen plates, accessory plates and bristles on the back of the palate has no match in mammals, but is reminiscent of other ectodermal structures in the mouth of other vertebrates. Generations of replacement teeth in reptiles, for instance, are arranged in patterns that show a maturation gradient from medial to lateral, but implantation of individual elements in rows that are oblique to the mediolateral plane (Westergaard & Ferguson, ; Whitlock & Richman, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Teeth are constantly replaced in most non‐mammalian gnathostomes (i.e., polyphyodonty) (Whitlock and Richman, ). Previous studies such as Edmund (, , ) have confirmed that the tooth replacement in diapsid reptiles is a well‐controlled phenomenon that produces a regular pattern in a single dentition including unerupted replacement teeth (Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%