1989
DOI: 10.1128/mmbr.53.4.377-389.1989
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biology of Haemophilus ducreyi.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
39
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
(73 reference statements)
1
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ability to produce CPE in HFF monolayers was, therefore, apparently independent of the ability of these strains to form microcolonies. The cohesiveness of cells of fresh clinical isolates of H. ducreyi is a well-recognized phenotypic characteristic of this organism (3,22,35) and is likely responsible for the microcolony formation observed in both this and a previous study (4). The potential importance of microcolony formation is reinforced by their presence in lesions formed after intradermal inoculation of rabbits with the virulent 35000 strain (27).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The ability to produce CPE in HFF monolayers was, therefore, apparently independent of the ability of these strains to form microcolonies. The cohesiveness of cells of fresh clinical isolates of H. ducreyi is a well-recognized phenotypic characteristic of this organism (3,22,35) and is likely responsible for the microcolony formation observed in both this and a previous study (4). The potential importance of microcolony formation is reinforced by their presence in lesions formed after intradermal inoculation of rabbits with the virulent 35000 strain (27).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…There are several caveats associated with the experiments described above which involved the study of H. ducreyi growth rates and kinetics of adherence to HFF cells in vitro. First, the enumeration of viable organisms (i.e., CFU determinations) to measure the rate of increase in bacterial numbers could be artificially skewed by the tendency of H. ducreyi to autoaggregate (3,22), and strain-to-strain variability in this trait could have affected these numbers. Second, variability in autoaggregation among H. ducreyi strains could have artificially increased the number of bacteria that came into contact with the HFF cells in the attachment assays (i.e., large clumps would settle more quickly and yield a higher degree of attachment).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, E. coli contains an assortment of adhesins which provide multiple attachment capabilities (14). Alternatively, because H. ducreyi strains in culture possess different colony types (2,22), it is possible that attachment is a function of the amount of each colony type present in the strain. Such differences in attachment capability associated with colony types are found with Neisseria gonorrhoeae, in which two different adhesins, pili and protein II, are subject to phase variation (18).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Haemin can serve as a source of both iron and protoporphyrin and is used optionally for growth under anaerobic conditions, whereas NAD, nicotinamide mononucleotide (NMN) or nicotinamide‐riboside are essential (Gingrich and Schlenk, 1944; Leder and Handler, 1951; Shifrine and Biberstein, 1960). Among the relevant Haemophilus species pathogenic to humans, only H. aphrophilus and H. ducreyi are not dependent on NAD (Sadowski and Robertson, 1979; Albritton, 1989; Mutters and Reidl, 1998), and plasmid‐associated NAD independence has been reported for H. parainfluenzae (Windsor et al ., 1991).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%