2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0329.2010.00658.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biology and pathology of Ribes and their implications for management of white pine blister rust

Abstract: Summary Ribes (currants and gooseberries) are telial hosts for the introduced and invasive white pine blister rust fungus, Cronartium ribicola. Knowledge of wild and introduced Ribes helps us understand the epidemiology of blister rust on its aecial hosts, white pines, and develop disease control and management strategies. Ribes differ by species in their contribution to initial establishment and subsequent intensification of blister rust. Their significance to pine infection depends on their inherent capacit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
101
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
2
101
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regeneration potential of these stands is considered limited, as remaining trees are widely scattered and genetic resistance to white pine blister rust is relatively low [38]. Early attempts to mitigate blister rust infection on white pines focused on eradication of shrubs of the genus Ribes (currants and gooseberries), the alternate and telial host for C. ribicola (for a thorough discussion of Ribes ecology and blister rust pathology see [48]). These efforts were abandoned in the 1960s in favor of current management strategies including conservation of heritable resistance traits, identification and protection of resistant trees, development of focused nursery breeding programs to increase resistance, outplanting of rust resistant stock, biological and chemical rust controls, silvilcultural practices designed to minimize Ribes germination, and removal of infected host trees or blister rust cankers [40,43].…”
Section: Threats To Persistence and Management Responsesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regeneration potential of these stands is considered limited, as remaining trees are widely scattered and genetic resistance to white pine blister rust is relatively low [38]. Early attempts to mitigate blister rust infection on white pines focused on eradication of shrubs of the genus Ribes (currants and gooseberries), the alternate and telial host for C. ribicola (for a thorough discussion of Ribes ecology and blister rust pathology see [48]). These efforts were abandoned in the 1960s in favor of current management strategies including conservation of heritable resistance traits, identification and protection of resistant trees, development of focused nursery breeding programs to increase resistance, outplanting of rust resistant stock, biological and chemical rust controls, silvilcultural practices designed to minimize Ribes germination, and removal of infected host trees or blister rust cankers [40,43].…”
Section: Threats To Persistence and Management Responsesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aeciospores produced on pines are durable and can occasionally be windblown several hundred kilometers via atmospheric transport to infect alternate hosts' leaves (Frank et al 2008). Infective, less durable basidiospores produced in late summer to autumn on the leaves of the alternate hosts may be windblown up to 27 km to the susceptible pines (Zambino 2010). Mountain pine beetle does not directly affect seedlings since the native bark beetle prefers larger diameter trees (Safranyik and Carroll 2006), but mortality of seed-producing trees may limit seed availability for reproduction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blister rust could be problematic in hydric sites because of higher abundance of Ribes spp. (currant and gooseberries) that serve as alternative hosts for this pathogen [36,37]. Damage due to the white pine cone beetle (Conophthorus coniperda (Schwarz)) and Armillaria root disease were also reported in the Lake States [38][39][40][41], but not in the study area.…”
Section: Ecology Of White Pine At Its Northern Limit Of Continuous DImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…can threaten restoration success, their abundance within a stand is not always correlated with local rust damage because the spores can be dispersed over long distances [61]. Past efforts to control Ribes mostly focused on eradication but were difficult, costly, and ineffective [37]. However, removal of Ribes from plantation sites and their close proximity could reduce the hazard [62].…”
Section: Site Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%