1995
DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(95)00162-r
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biologically effective dose distribution based on the linear quadratic model and its clinical relevance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
59
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
59
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A second process that might slightly reduce the a/b estimate when large fractions are used is the increased effect of dose inhomogeneity on dose intensity as fraction size increases, so-called 'triple trouble' [23]. Dose inhomogeneity ('double trouble') is always bad, and is important even when 2.0 Gy fractions are used [24,25]. Simple calculations show that the added impact of hypofractionation (triple trouble) can be ignored for practical purposes provided full dose compensation is applied.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second process that might slightly reduce the a/b estimate when large fractions are used is the increased effect of dose inhomogeneity on dose intensity as fraction size increases, so-called 'triple trouble' [23]. Dose inhomogeneity ('double trouble') is always bad, and is important even when 2.0 Gy fractions are used [24,25]. Simple calculations show that the added impact of hypofractionation (triple trouble) can be ignored for practical purposes provided full dose compensation is applied.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 In addition, radiotherapy techniques have greatly improved, leading to more homogeneous dose distributions and therefore to a lower chance of toxicity. 53 Partial shielding of the heart 10 was applied in our cohort, depending on tumor localization. We could not examine possible dose-effect or dose-volume relations because details on radiation dose and volume were not collected.…”
Section: Org Frommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Lee et al [27] recently supplemented external beam isodose distributions with two dimensional iso-biological effective dose contours after accounting for tissue radiosensitivity and treatment fraction schedules. Although the present knowledge of the important radioresponse parameters may be limited, biological considerations, relative to the standard physics calculations (such as Medical Internal Radiation Dosimetry, MIRD, which compute average dose and can ignore dose heterogeneity), may more reliably predict radiation treatment outcomes in animal studies involving radiation dose heterogeneity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%