2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biologically and mechanically driven design of an RGD-mimetic macroporous foam for adipose tissue engineering applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The large-size and round porosity adequate for adipocyte colonization and the isotropic structure of apple hypanthium present interesting similarities with human AT, and mechanical investigation confirmed its suitability in mimicking the mechanical features of the native AT (E apple = 4 kPa vs. E adipose tissue = 2–20 kPa) ( Omidi et al, 2014 ; Van Nieuwenhove et al, 2017 ). The decellularized scaffolds also show mechanical features comparable to those of other AT scaffolds proposed in literature ( Davidenko et al, 2010 ; Yu et al, 2013 ; Rossi et al, 2016 ). Carrot-derived scaffolds are characterized by a smaller and heterogeneous porosity, related to higher mechanical properties and lower water adsorption, compared to the apple structures.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The large-size and round porosity adequate for adipocyte colonization and the isotropic structure of apple hypanthium present interesting similarities with human AT, and mechanical investigation confirmed its suitability in mimicking the mechanical features of the native AT (E apple = 4 kPa vs. E adipose tissue = 2–20 kPa) ( Omidi et al, 2014 ; Van Nieuwenhove et al, 2017 ). The decellularized scaffolds also show mechanical features comparable to those of other AT scaffolds proposed in literature ( Davidenko et al, 2010 ; Yu et al, 2013 ; Rossi et al, 2016 ). Carrot-derived scaffolds are characterized by a smaller and heterogeneous porosity, related to higher mechanical properties and lower water adsorption, compared to the apple structures.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Samples were tested up to 30% strain to replicate AT physiological conditions ( Frydrych et al, 2015 ) and were able to sustain this deformation without failure. Hydrated decellularized apple-derived samples were characterized by a compression modulus of 4.17 ± 0.17 kPa; this is comparable to that of native human adipose tissue [e.g., E breast tissue ( Van Nieuwenhove et al, 2017 ) = 2 kPa, E abdomen tissue ( Omidi et al, 2014 ) = 3.3 kPa] and to those of recently proposed scaffolds for AT regeneration, including polyamidoamine foams ( Rossi et al, 2016 ) ( E = 3.4–4.4 kPa), decellularized AT ( Yu et al, 2013 ) ( E = 2.4–4 kPa) and collagen-hyaluronic acid scaffolds ( Davidenko et al, 2010 ) ( E = 5.39–6.73 kPa). No statistical difference was observed between the elastic moduli of decellularized and control samples ( Table 1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The combination of adult stem cells from various sources within 3D polymeric structures has been one of the most approached to generate 3D adipose-like tissues. The majority of these works have been using 3T3-L1 [ 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 ], a murine pre-adipocyte cell line that has limited representation of human tissue physiology. In alternative, adult stem cells have been differentiated into the adipogenic lineage in a range of natural/synthetic materials [ 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, bioactive properties can be incorporated into other materials through presentation of peptides (e.g., RGD to promote adhesion) from a hydrogel backbone. [327] Injectable biomaterials and 3D porous implantable scaffolds are commonly used to deliver cells for adipose tissue regeneration. Injectable materials are advantageous because they allow minimally invasive delivery, can conform to any tissue geometry, and can gel in situ.…”
Section: Adipose Tissue Biomaterialsmentioning
confidence: 99%