2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2006.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biological weighting functions as a tool for evaluating two ways to measure UVB radiation inhibition on photosynthesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Normalization allowed comparison between wavelength responses of the different processes and previously published 300 nm normalized BWFs (Cullen et al, 1992;Neale et al, 1998;Neale & Kieber, 2000;Villafan˜e et al 2003;Andreasson & Wangberg, 2006). The normalized BWFs for both LL cultures were remarkably similar.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Normalization allowed comparison between wavelength responses of the different processes and previously published 300 nm normalized BWFs (Cullen et al, 1992;Neale et al, 1998;Neale & Kieber, 2000;Villafan˜e et al 2003;Andreasson & Wangberg, 2006). The normalized BWFs for both LL cultures were remarkably similar.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…BWFs obtained under solar radiation are preferred over those using artificial irradiance conditions (Sobrino et al, 2005;Andreasson & Wangberg, 2006), since UVR effects are the net result of damage and repair, or protective processes that are influenced by different wavelength regions, including PAR. On the other hand, natural irradiance exposure might cause problems due to shortterm irradiance variability resulting from passing clouds such as occurring in our experiments on the 24th of January.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…When applying a BWF for inhibition of photosynthesis obtained from the phycobilin containing cryptophyte Rhodomonas sp. the UV-B enhancement level was 50% compared with the unweighted intensity (Andreasson and Wängberg, 2006). Therefore, our UV-B intensity was equivalent to ca.…”
Section: Experimental Design and Light Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 84%