1989
DOI: 10.1093/clinchem/35.5.783
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biological variability of 26 clinical chemistry analytes in elderly people.

Abstract: Analytical, within-subject, and between-subject components of variation were estimated for 26 clinical chemistry analytes from duplicate analyses of 10 specimens collected from 27 healthy elderly subjects over a period of 20 weeks. Within-subject variations were similar to those generated previously by us in younger subjects. We conclude, therefore, that homeostasis is not compromised by age alone, and biological variability does not increase simply with age. All analytes except serum water had marked individu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0
6

Year Published

1993
1993
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
25
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Our data indicate that high individuality is present for many routinely measured biochemical analytes in dogs. This is consistent with the human medical literature, where many analytes have high degrees of individuality on serial determination . Using criteria established by Fraser and others, an index of individuality < 0.7 (when calculated as CV G /(CV A 2 +CV I 2 ) 1/2 , as performed in this study) indicates that comparison of an individual to a population‐based reference interval is appropriate, whereas an index of > 1.7 indicates that a population‐based reference interval is of limited utility .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Our data indicate that high individuality is present for many routinely measured biochemical analytes in dogs. This is consistent with the human medical literature, where many analytes have high degrees of individuality on serial determination . Using criteria established by Fraser and others, an index of individuality < 0.7 (when calculated as CV G /(CV A 2 +CV I 2 ) 1/2 , as performed in this study) indicates that comparison of an individual to a population‐based reference interval is appropriate, whereas an index of > 1.7 indicates that a population‐based reference interval is of limited utility .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…It is therefore strongly advisable not to determine ALT activity in frozen samples, as a falsely decreased ALT activity may be found. Day‐to‐day variations of 10–30% have been observed 29. Moreover, significant diurnal variations have been reported in both healthy subjects and in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD), necessitating standardised blood sampling times when comparing enzyme values in clinical practice and research 30.…”
Section: Biochemistry and Laboratory Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BV estimates in people are made in clinically healthy individuals, even though resulting data are intended to be applied to all populations (sick, adult, geriatric, and so on) . Although mean values for laboratory results can vary by sex, health status, breed, and age, the inherent biological variability around a given homeostatic set point appears constant, even in chronic disease states . This suggests that BV data from our study are likely applicable to most horses, not just healthy, nonathletic mares.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%