1996
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0290(19960420)50:2<136::aid-bit3>3.0.co;2-n
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biological sulfate reduction using synthesis gas as energy and carbon source

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
11
1
3

Year Published

1997
1997
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
11
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Many potential applications of H 2 ‐rich gasses are strongly inhibited by the presence of CO; i.e. 10% CO for biological sulfate reduction with synthesis gas [9] or 20 ppm for hydrogen fuel cell applications [10]. In particular the biological formation of H 2 from CO is attractive for upgrading synthesis gas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many potential applications of H 2 ‐rich gasses are strongly inhibited by the presence of CO; i.e. 10% CO for biological sulfate reduction with synthesis gas [9] or 20 ppm for hydrogen fuel cell applications [10]. In particular the biological formation of H 2 from CO is attractive for upgrading synthesis gas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In any potential application of SRB bioreactors, the selection of electron donor source is expected to have an impact on the economics of the process and will be a site‐specific design criterion. Lactic acid, ethanol, hydrogen, synthesis gas, and sewage digest have been utilized as electron donors (Apel and Barnes, 1993; Kaufman et al, 1996, 1997; Hiligsman et al, 1996; Dasu and Sublette, 1989; Paques and HTS, 1995; Buisman et al, 1995; Hammock and Edenborn, 1992; Du Preez et al, 1992; van Houten et al, 1996; Selvaraj and Sublette, 1995; Selvaraj et al, 1996) . While lactic acid and ethanol may be utilized in very specific situations where their availability is fortuitous, they are probably too expensive to be used as feedstocks for the process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively the untreated synthesis gas, including the CO, could be fed to the SR bioreactor. Van Houten (1995b) found that the SR rate dropped from 12 to 14 g SO 4 2-L -1 day -1 to 6-8 g SO 4 2-L -1 day -1 when adding 5% CO to the H 2 /CO 2 feed gas. Increasing the percentage CO to 20% did not further deteriorate the SR rate.…”
Section: Synthesis Gasmentioning
confidence: 99%