2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(05)64830-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biological Significance of C-met Over Expression in Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma

Abstract: Our study indicates that c-met over expression may be associated with an aggressive phenotype in these tumors.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

4
34
1
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
4
34
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Most tumors with strong c-Met expression were found to have a serous papillary histology, but 3 of 10 clear cell cancers showed strong c-Met expression, suggesting that c-Met is highly expressed in this rare but clinically aggressive histologic subtype. This finding expands on those of previous studies that have reported the expression of c-Met in clear cell cancers (32) and renal cell cancer, which resembles clear cell cancer in its histologic appearance (33). Yet, although we believe that we have established c-Met overexpression as a marker for human ovarian cancer, we are aware that the percentage of patients with strong c-Met expression (11%) may seem too low to justify developing c-Met as a therapeutic target.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Most tumors with strong c-Met expression were found to have a serous papillary histology, but 3 of 10 clear cell cancers showed strong c-Met expression, suggesting that c-Met is highly expressed in this rare but clinically aggressive histologic subtype. This finding expands on those of previous studies that have reported the expression of c-Met in clear cell cancers (32) and renal cell cancer, which resembles clear cell cancer in its histologic appearance (33). Yet, although we believe that we have established c-Met overexpression as a marker for human ovarian cancer, we are aware that the percentage of patients with strong c-Met expression (11%) may seem too low to justify developing c-Met as a therapeutic target.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Because all biological activities of HGF are mediated by a single receptor, the expression and levels of c-met protein not only determine the cell-type specificity of HGF actions but also dictate the overall activities of this paired signaling system. Consistent with this view, earlier studies indicate that it is the abundance and activity of c-met receptor, rather than HGF itself, that best correlate with the biological function of HGF in diverse organs under physiological and pathological conditions (8,28,39).…”
mentioning
confidence: 67%
“…For example, MET mutations are very rare in patients with sporadic papillary cancer (25). Although immunohistochemical-based expression of c-MET has been described in the sporadic forms of papillary renal cell carcinoma, the physiologic relevance of this finding remains unclear (26). The BHD gene is occasionally inactivated in spontaneous renal cell carcinomas of various subtypes, but once again whether this is important to the malignant phenotype remains unknown (27).…”
Section: Genetics and Biologymentioning
confidence: 99%