2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2004.12.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biological responses to the chemical recovery of acidified fresh waters in the UK

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
76
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
76
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A few studies on the ecological impact of pollution address the problem of lake acidification in the 19th and 20th centuries ce (e.g. Monteith et al, 2005;Schindler, 1988) and the issue of atmospheric deposition of reactive nitrogen (Nr) since the start of the 20th century (e.g. Hastings et al, 2009).…”
Section: Pollutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few studies on the ecological impact of pollution address the problem of lake acidification in the 19th and 20th centuries ce (e.g. Monteith et al, 2005;Schindler, 1988) and the issue of atmospheric deposition of reactive nitrogen (Nr) since the start of the 20th century (e.g. Hastings et al, 2009).…”
Section: Pollutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, hysteresis, time lags between a pressure change and the corresponding change in the communities, non-linear responses, points of no return and climate changes, may create confounding effects in the evaluation of systems recovery (Lyytimä ki and Hildé n, 2007;Jeppesen et al, 2005;Monteith et al, 2005). Therefore, these factors should be considered when analyzing cause-effect relationships in a recovery process and future developments in predictive modeling may consider predictions in climate change scenarios.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given many successful efforts to reduce both acid deposition and liquid industrial effluents to receiving waters, the attention of aquatic ecologists has turned to what factors regulate the pace, extent and dynamics of recovery of previously damaged communities (Monteith et al, 2005;Keller et al, 2007). For lakes that were historically damaged by atmospheric acid inputs, both external (colonist delivery to the pelagic community from the metacommunity or egg bank) and internal (colonist survival and growth) factors may be important, and which are more important can vary among lake regions and over time (Gray and Arnott, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%