2016
DOI: 10.1186/s12890-016-0174-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biological quality control for cardiopulmonary exercise testing in multicenter clinical trials

Abstract: BackgroundPrecision and accuracy assurance in cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) facilitates multicenter clinical trials by maximizing statistical power and minimizing participant risk. Current guidelines recommend quality control that is largely based on precision at individual testing centers (minimizing test–retest variability). The aim of this study was to establish a multicenter biological quality control (BioQC) method that considers both precision and accuracy in CPET.MethodsBioQC testing was 6-min… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For CMR, a sample of 75 individuals per group was estimated to identify a 3% difference between groups in ejection fraction and assuming an SD of 4.5 and a standardized difference of 0.43. For exercise stress testing, a sample of 55 individuals per group was estimated to detect a 15% difference in indexed V̇ o 2 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For CMR, a sample of 75 individuals per group was estimated to identify a 3% difference between groups in ejection fraction and assuming an SD of 4.5 and a standardized difference of 0.43. For exercise stress testing, a sample of 55 individuals per group was estimated to detect a 15% difference in indexed V̇ o 2 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computerized MC can determine CRF with CVs between 4% to 9% due to several sources of variation, such as environmental conditions, biological variability, and technical characteristics of the metabolic cart [9]. Human physiological variation might account for between 5% to 10% of differences during cycling at moderate intensity under steady-state conditions [28,29]. In addition, given the fluctuation of breath-by-breath data, its processing may also contribute to variation in ventilatory parameters outcomes at submaximal intensities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even when automated system calibration appears accurate, results may be erroneous ( 61 ). Biological validation can be achieved by testing laboratory staff on a monthly basis at matched submaximal work rates, and for VO 2 /work rate slope ( 62 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%