2020
DOI: 10.1016/bs.mie.2020.04.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biological fitness landscapes by deep mutational scanning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One way to probe the importance of native residues in mediating protein–cofactor and protein–protein interactions is to evaluate the effects of mutations on cellular function. In cases in which a high-throughput selection is available, large numbers of mutations can be evaluated in parallel using laboratory evolution. With this approach, a library of genes encoding mutant proteins is created, and the library is subjected to next generation sequencing before and after selection for biomolecules with parent-like functions . The changes in the abundance of each mutant are then used to calculate the ratio of sequence counts before and after selection, which can be used to estimate the relative activities of mutant proteins.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One way to probe the importance of native residues in mediating protein–cofactor and protein–protein interactions is to evaluate the effects of mutations on cellular function. In cases in which a high-throughput selection is available, large numbers of mutations can be evaluated in parallel using laboratory evolution. With this approach, a library of genes encoding mutant proteins is created, and the library is subjected to next generation sequencing before and after selection for biomolecules with parent-like functions . The changes in the abundance of each mutant are then used to calculate the ratio of sequence counts before and after selection, which can be used to estimate the relative activities of mutant proteins.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We determined the frequency of each rnc mutant by deep-sequencing at the beginning and end of the competition. From these frequencies, we determined relative fitness ( w ) values, corresponding to the mean growth rate of cells containing a mutant RNase III relative to the mean growth rate of cells containing alleles synonymous to wildtype (Mehlhoff and Ostermeier 2020). We utilize the frequency of wildtype synonymous alleles instead of the frequency of wildtype because wildtype synonyms occurred more frequently in the library and wildtype sequencing counts are more prone to being affected by the artifact of PCR template jumping (Pääbo, et al 1990; Kebschull and Zador 2015) during the preparation of barcoded amplicons for deep-sequencing.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some recent reviews include [74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81]. Increasingly, the use of 'deep mutational scanning' [82][83][84][85][86][87][88][89][90], sometimes coupled to FACS-based sorting [91] ('sort-seq' [52,82,83,92]), is making available large amounts of sequence-activity pairs [85]. (We ourselves made available one million paired aptamer activity sequences in 2010 [93].)…”
Section: Directed Protein Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%