2017
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179340
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biological effects of the hypomagnetic field: An analytical review of experiments and theories

Abstract: During interplanetary flights in the near future, a human organism will be exposed to prolonged periods of a hypomagnetic field that is 10,000 times weaker than that of Earth’s. Attenuation of the geomagnetic field occurs in buildings with steel walls and in buildings with steel reinforcement. It cannot be ruled out also that a zero magnetic field might be interesting in biomedical studies and therapy. Further research in the area of hypomagnetic field effects, as shown in this article, is capable of shedding … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
107
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 166 publications
1
107
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, because hypomagnetic field conditions allow for an assessment of bioeffects under near-zero field conditions, this can be taken as a standard of reference [Binhi and Prato, 2017b]. Interdisciplinary collaboration Seek collaboration between biologists and/or physicians, with engineers, and/or physicists.…”
Section: Sample Containersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further, because hypomagnetic field conditions allow for an assessment of bioeffects under near-zero field conditions, this can be taken as a standard of reference [Binhi and Prato, 2017b]. Interdisciplinary collaboration Seek collaboration between biologists and/or physicians, with engineers, and/or physicists.…”
Section: Sample Containersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…of magnetobiology. Further, because hypomagnetic field conditions allow for an assessment of bioeffects under near-zero field conditions, this can be taken as a standard of reference [Binhi and Prato, 2017b]. All in all, it must be concluded that regardless of shielding the control samples (e.g., enclosing them in mu-metal containers) or not, what is crucial is to provide the full details of the fields at the location of controls/shams; it is impossible to replicate an experiment without complete knowledge of all MF components affecting the sham/control samples.…”
Section: Sample Containersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a narrow sense, magnetoreception refers to the acute ability of animals to detect the GMF (Lohmann, 2010). However, increasing evidence for chronic responses of organisms to magnetic field variation suggests the importance of general magnetoreception in biological processes across taxa (Binhi and Prato, 2017;Henshaw et al, 2009;Maffei, 2014;Wan et al, 2016;Wan et al, 2014;Wan et al, 2015b;Wang et al, 2008). Among studies that subject organisms to different magnetic field intensity treatments, many concern the bioeffects induced by the near-zero magnetic field (NZMF) (Binhi and Prato, 2017;Wang et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, increasing evidence for chronic responses of organisms to magnetic field variation suggests the importance of general magnetoreception in biological processes across taxa (Binhi and Prato, 2017;Henshaw et al, 2009;Maffei, 2014;Wan et al, 2016;Wan et al, 2014;Wan et al, 2015b;Wang et al, 2008). Among studies that subject organisms to different magnetic field intensity treatments, many concern the bioeffects induced by the near-zero magnetic field (NZMF) (Binhi and Prato, 2017;Wang et al, 2008). Although there may be the need for human beings to understand how organisms from Earth might perform during space travel where the field is ~10,000 times weaker than that of Earth's (Mallis and DeRoshia, 2005), the NZMF can also be taken as a sham control for the study of specific magnetoreception mechanisms (Fedele et al, 2014;Heyers et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, few studies have focused on responses of animals to changes in geomagnetic field intensity at levels that naturally vary in their environment [12, 16]. Most studies of the bioeffects of GMF on organisms in the last decade have been conducted by either shielding or enhancing the GMF, and have highlighted its importance in maintaining homeostasis [13, 15, 17]. Our work with migratory white-backed planthopper, Sogatella furcifera , showed that the absence of GMF can affect the expression of important migration-related behaviours, potentially through Cry-mediated hormone signaling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%