2007
DOI: 10.1017/s1473550406003545
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biological effects of gamma-ray bursts: distances for severe damage on the biota

Abstract: We present in this work a unified, quantitative synthesis of analytical and numerical calculations of the effects that could be caused on Earth by a GammaRay Burst (GRB), considering atmospheric and biological implications. The main effects of the illumination by a GRB are classified in four distinct ones and have been calculated. In spite of not belonging to the so-called "classical" GRBs, most of the parameters of this recent flare are quite well-known and have been used as a calibration for our study. We fi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One should mention that the degree to which Galactic GRBs disrupt ecologies on habitable planets is controversial. Studies of Thorsett (1995), Scalo and Wheeler (2002), Dar and De Rújula (2002), and Galante and Horvath (2007) tend to assign large "lethal zones" to such events, while a recent study of Thomas et al (2008) obtain significantly smaller volumes (and thus astrobiologically less interesting). Without going into details of this debate, two points are worth mentioning here.…”
Section: Catastrophes and Phase Transitionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One should mention that the degree to which Galactic GRBs disrupt ecologies on habitable planets is controversial. Studies of Thorsett (1995), Scalo and Wheeler (2002), Dar and De Rújula (2002), and Galante and Horvath (2007) tend to assign large "lethal zones" to such events, while a recent study of Thomas et al (2008) obtain significantly smaller volumes (and thus astrobiologically less interesting). Without going into details of this debate, two points are worth mentioning here.…”
Section: Catastrophes and Phase Transitionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In particular, biotic effects of GRBs occurring in our Galaxy have been subject to much investigation since the realization of their cosmological-and hence highly energetic-nature (Thorsett 1995;Scalo and Wheeler 2002;Thomas et al 2005;Galante and Horvath 2007). The number of discovered extra-Solar System planetary systems and their diversity continues to increase (e.g., Jones et al 2006;von Bloh et al 2007).…”
Section: Introduction: Fermi's Paradoxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no direct experimental data on the effects of this kind of radiation in the planetary context. Theoretical modeling has made predictions concerning the effects of radiation on the Earth's biosphere and revealed the biological importance of UVflashes from GRBs delivered to the surface of the Earth, considering different present and prehistoric atmospheres (Galante and Horvath, 2007;Mart ín et al, 2009Mart ín et al, , 2010Horvath and Galante, 2012).…”
Section: Direct Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At spacecraft altitude, the dose of cosmic radiation averages about 0.2 mGy per day (Goossens et al, 2006), while about 100 Gy is necessary to inactivate 37 % of E. coli (Quint et al, 2002), a bacterium that is very radiation-sensitive compared to bacterial isolates from the HAA (Yang et al, 2009b). Cosmic rays are thought to be much less effective in damaging terrestrial life than UV radiation (Galante and Horvath, 2007).…”
Section: Survival Under Radiation In the Haamentioning
confidence: 99%