2008
DOI: 10.1248/jhs.54.267
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biological Effects of and Responses to Exposure to Electrophilic Environmental Chemicals

Abstract: Electrophiles readily bind to nucleophilic centers on intracellular macromolecules such as DNA and proteins. Electrophilic attack on DNA results in the formation of an adduct, leading to depurination due to hydrolysis of a purine base such as adenine or guanine. On the other hand, electrophiles also attack proteins, with the thiolate function as the most attractive site. Many protein cysteine (Cys) thiols are affected by their proximity to basic amino acids, which results a decrease in the thiol pKa value. Thi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Taking into account these observations, it is reasonable to assume that nucleophilic groups other than GSH’s thiol could be more reactive toward MeHg, allowing for the formation of high affinity complexes, thus leading to dysfunction of important cellular molecules with nucleophilic properties. In agreement with this hypothesis, thiol groups from specific proteins [tyrosine phosphatase (Sumi, 2008) and creatine kinase (Wang et al, 2001)] are more nucleophilic and, consequently, more reactive than GSH (Farina et al, 2010). Toxicological consequences of this phenomenon have already been reported (Glasser et al, 2010).…”
Section: Mehg Interacts With Selenol Groupsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Taking into account these observations, it is reasonable to assume that nucleophilic groups other than GSH’s thiol could be more reactive toward MeHg, allowing for the formation of high affinity complexes, thus leading to dysfunction of important cellular molecules with nucleophilic properties. In agreement with this hypothesis, thiol groups from specific proteins [tyrosine phosphatase (Sumi, 2008) and creatine kinase (Wang et al, 2001)] are more nucleophilic and, consequently, more reactive than GSH (Farina et al, 2010). Toxicological consequences of this phenomenon have already been reported (Glasser et al, 2010).…”
Section: Mehg Interacts With Selenol Groupsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…), as well as with nonprotein thiols (i.e. glutathione, cysteine), are crucial events in mediating its neurotoxicity (Clarkson et al, 2003; Sumi, 2008). By direct interaction with thiols, as well as indirect mechanisms (discussed latter), MeHg can modify the oxidation state of the -SH groups on proteins, modulating their functions (Kim et al, 2002).…”
Section: Mercurymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cys is known to be a strong nucleophile within various proteins, although its nucleophilicity depends on the pH and on the immediate area surrounding the amino acid residue. 43 To confirm the covalent bond formation between β-Lg and shikonin, a tryptic digest of β-LgA and β-LgA−SHI was performed, and the two resulting peptide maps, which were obtained by means of HPLC-MS analysis, were compared.…”
Section: ■ Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%